Impact of Surface Type, Wheelchair Weight, and Axle Position on Wheelchair Propulsion by Novice Older Adults
Refers to article:
On “Impact of Surface Type, Wheelchair Weight, and Axle Position on Wheelchair Propulsion by Novice Older Adults”
Stephen Sprigle
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
July 2009 (Vol. 90, Issue 7, Pages 1073-1075) Abstract |
Full Text |
Full-Text PDF (124 KB)
Abstract
Cowan RE, Nash MS, Collinger JL, Koontz AM, Boninger ML. Impact of surface type, wheelchair weight, and axle position on wheelchair propulsion by novice older adults.
Objective
To examine the impact of surface type, wheelchair weight, and rear axle position on older adult propulsion biomechanics.
Design
Crossover trial.
Setting
Biomechanics laboratory.
Participants
Convenience sample of 53 ambulatory older adults with minimal wheelchair experience (65–87y); men, n=20; women, n=33.
Intervention
Participants propelled 4 different wheelchair configurations over 4 surfaces: tile, low carpet, high carpet, and an 8% grade ramp (surface, chair order randomized). Chair configurations included (1) unweighted chair with an anterior axle position, (2) 9.05kg weighted chair with an anterior axle position, (3) unweighted chair with a posterior axle position (Δ0.08m), and (4) 9.05kg weighted chair with a posterior axle position (Δ0.08m). Weight was added to a titanium folding chair, simulating the weight difference between very light and depot wheelchairs. Instrumented wheels measured propulsion kinetics.
Main Outcome Measures
Average self-selected velocity, push frequency, stroke length, peak resultant and tangential force.
Results
Velocity decreased as surface rolling resistance or chair weight increased. Peak resultant and tangential forces increased as chair weight increased, as surface resistance increased, and with a posterior axle position. The effect of a posterior axle position was greater on high carpet and the ramp. The effect of weight was constant, but was more easily observed on high carpet and ramp. The effects of axle position and weight were independent of one another.
Conclusion
Increased surface resistance decreases self-selected velocity and increases peak forces. Increased weight decreases self-selected velocity and increases forces. Anterior axle positions decrease forces, more so on high carpet. The effects of weight and axle position are independent. The greatest reductions in peak forces occur in lighter chairs with anterior axle positions.
aHuman Engineering Research Laboratories, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
bVA Pittsburgh Health Care System Center of Excellence in Wheelchairs and Related Technology, Pittsburgh, PA
cDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
dSchool of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
eDepartment of Rehabilitation Science and Technology, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
fDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
gDepartments of Neurological Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL
hMiami Project to Cure Paralysis, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL
Reprint requests to Michael L. Boninger, MD, Human Engineering Research Laboratories, VA Pittsburgh Health Care System, 5180 Highland Dr 151R–1, Pittsburgh, PA 15206
Supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant nos. 1 F31 HD053986-01, P30 AG024827, AG023641), the National Science Foundation (DGE0333420, Graduate Research Fellowship), and the Department of Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Research and Development (grant no. B3142C).
We certify that we have affiliations with or financial involvement (eg, employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants and patents received or pending, royalties) with an organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the article. Rachel Cowan has a nonfinancial affiliation with Three Rivers Holdings, Inc, in the form of subcontracted grants.