Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 90, Issue 8 , Pages 1332-1339 , August 2009

Comparison of 3 Needle Sizes for Trigger Point Injection in Myofascial Pain Syndrome of Upper- and Middle-Trapezius Muscle: A Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Seung-Hyun Yoon, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Seung-Hyun Yoon, MD, PhD, Dept of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ajou University School of Medicine, San 5, Wonchon-dong, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon 443-721, Republic of Korea
  • ,
  • Ueon Woo Rah, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
  • ,
  • Seung Soo Sheen, MD, MS

      Affiliations

    • Section of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics in Clinical Trial Center, Ajou University Medical Center, Suwon, Republic of Korea
  • ,
  • Kye Hee Cho, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea

  • Image Result

    Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials flow chart of the study. TPI, trigger point injection.

    Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials flow chart of the study. TPI, trigger point injection.

  • Image Result

    Mean changes of VAS score at pre- (day 0) and post- (days 1, 4, 7, 14) treatment. A negative change indicates a more favorable result. There were significant differences of VAS score at posttreatment

    Mean changes of VAS score at pre- (day 0) and post- (days 1, 4, 7, 14) treatment. A negative change indicates a more favorable result. There were significant differences of VAS score at posttreatment on days 4, 7, 14 compared with pretreatment in all groups. There were no significant differences between 3 different needle size groups at pre- and posttreatment on days 1, 4, 7, 14. No statistically significant differences between 3 different needle size groups at pre- and posttreatment on days 1, 4, 7, 14 (P>.05). Mean values and SE are shown. *Statistically significant difference compared with pretreatment (P<.013).

  • Image Result
    Mean changes of NDI score at pre- (day 0) and posttreatment (days 7, 14). A negative change indicates a more favorable result. There were significant differences of NDI score at posttreatment on days

    Mean changes of NDI score at pre- (day 0) and posttreatment (days 7, 14). A negative change indicates a more favorable result. There were significant differences of NDI score at posttreatment on days 7, 14 compared with pretreatment in all groups. There were no significant differences between 3 different needle size groups at pre- and posttreatment on days 7, 14. No statistically significant differences between 3 different needle size groups at pre- and posttreatment on days 7, 14 (P>.05). Mean values and SE are shown. *Statistically significant difference compared with pretreatment (P<.025).

  • Image Result
    Mean changes of SF-36 at pre- (day 0) and posttreatment (days 7, 14). A positive change indicates a more favorable result. There were significant differences in SF-36 score at posttreatment on days 7,

    Mean changes of SF-36 at pre- (day 0) and posttreatment (days 7, 14). A positive change indicates a more favorable result. There were significant differences in SF-36 score at posttreatment on days 7, 14 compared with pretreatment in the 21- and 23-gauge needle groups. But in the 25-gauge needle groups, there was no difference in SF-36 score at posttreatment on days 7, 14. There were no significant differences between 3 different needle size groups at pre- and posttreatment on day 7. There were significant differences between the 21- and 25-gauge needle groups at posttreatment on day 14. Mean values and SE are shown. *Statistically significant difference compared with pretreatment (P<.025). Statistically significant difference between the 21- and 25-gauge needle group on day 14 (P<.05).

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(09)00274-3

doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.01.028

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 90, Issue 8 , Pages 1332-1339 , August 2009