Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 90, Issue 6 , Pages 913-918, June 2009

Rationale of the Combined Use of Inspiratory and Expiratory Devices in Improving Maximal Inspiratory Pressure and Maximal Expiratory Pressure of Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

  • Elvia Battaglia, MD

      Affiliations

    • Pulmonary Department, San Carlo Borromeo Hospital, Milan, Italy
  • ,
  • Alessandro Fulgenzi, BSci

      Affiliations

    • Institute of General Pathology, University of the Study, Milan, Italy
  • ,
  • Maria Elena Ferrero, MD

      Affiliations

    • Institute of General Pathology, University of the Study, Milan, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Maria Elena Ferrero, MD, Istituto di Patologia Generale, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Luigi Mangiagalli, 31, 20133 Milano, Italy

Abstract 

Battaglia E, Fulgenzi A, Ferrero ME. Rationale of the combined use of inspiratory and expiratory devices in improving maximal inspiratory pressure and maximal expiratory pressure of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Objective

To examine the rationale of the combined use of a new expiratory device in association with a previously assessed inspiratory device in improving 3 indicators of the respiratory muscle strength, for example, maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), and dyspnea grade.

Design

Randomized trial.

Setting

Home-based pulmonary rehabilitation.

Participants

Adults (N=32; mean age, 68y).

Main Outcome Measure

We instructed 32 patients with mild to very severe COPD to use the devices, and randomized them in a 1:1 ratio: they were assigned to the sham training control group (16 patients who trained at a load not able to improve MIP and MEP) or to the training group (16 patients). The patients trained at home twice daily for 15 minutes, 7 days a week, for 12 months. MIP and MEP as well as dyspnea perception were evaluated at 1, 6, and 12 months from the beginning of the training. The impact of additional work of breathing was measured at baseline and after the use of the expiratory device.

Results

The patients who performed the respiratory training showed significant and progressive improvements of MIP (81±4 at 12 months vs 57±7 as basal values expressed in cm H2O; P<.05) and MEP (97±2 at 12 months vs 62±4 as basal values; P<.05) at the end of the training. In addition, they showed a significant reduction of dyspnea perception (1.18±0.29 vs 2.93±0.32 as basal values; P<.05) at the end of the training.

Conclusions

This study suggests that home exercise with the combined use of our expiratory and inspiratory devices leads to a significant improvement of respiratory muscle function in patients with mild to very severe COPD.

Key Words: Pulmonary disease, chronic obstructive, Rehabilitation

List of Abbreviations: ANOVA, analysis of variance, COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, GOLD, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease, IMT, inspiratory muscle training, MEP, maximal expiratory pressure, MIP, maximal inspiratory pressure, QOL, quality of life, WBimp, work of breathing

 

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(09)00184-1

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2008.12.019

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 90, Issue 6 , Pages 913-918, June 2009