Journal Home
Search for

Volume 90, Issue 6, Pages 975-981 (June 2009)


View previous. 15 of 32 View next.

Driving Behaviors Among Community-Dwelling Persons With Multiple Sclerosis

Data were presented August 16, 2008 at the American Psychological Association, Boston, MA.

Maria T. Schultheis, PhDabCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Valerie Weisser, MAa, Kevin Manning, MSa, Allison Blasco, BSa, Jocelyn Ang, BAa

Abstract 

Schultheis MT, Weisser V, Manning K, Blasco A, Ang J. Driving behaviors among community-dwelling persons with multiple sclerosis.

Objective

The current study examined driver behaviors and patterns among drivers with multiple sclerosis (MS) as a function of disease severity and in comparison to drivers without MS.

Design

Between-group comparisons of participants with and without MS and cohorts of MS groups at varying levels of severity.

Setting

All data were collected in an outpatient research setting.

Participants

Community-dwelling persons (n=66) with clinically definite MS who were active drivers and healthy controls (n=30) were included.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Driving characteristics' measures included (1) driving frequency defined in days and miles driven per week, (2) self-reports of voluntarily limited driving behaviors, (3) changes in driving since MS diagnosis, and (4) self-rating as a driver. Driving performance was also assessed by using pass/borderline performance on a clinical behind-the-wheel evaluation.

Results

Mann-Whitney U tests showed a significant difference in driving frequency (P=.021) with MS participants reporting they drove fewer days per week than healthy control group. This was also seen between cohorts of MS drivers (P=.014), with high Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) participants driving less frequently than the low EDSS group. Descriptive observations suggested that participants with moderate EDSS scores drove less and engaged in more self-limiting behaviors. Chi-square tests showed that participants with high EDSS scores were more likely to report changing their driving behavior after diagnosis (P=.01) and were more likely to not pass the behind-the-wheel evaluation (P<.001).

Conclusions

The current findings suggest that as disease severity progresses, differences in frequency of driving (days per week) and the use of self-limiting driving behaviors may vary. Furthermore, the findings also raise questions regarding the overall sensitivity of the most commonly used clinical driving assessment method (the behind-the-wheel evaluation) to accurately capture driving capacity in the milder stages of the disease process. The results indicate the need to consider issues related to driving as MS severity progresses, and, given the progressive nature of MS and the concerns of the validity of the most common clinical driving assessment measures (the behind-the-wheel evaluation), repeated assessment of driving ability may be the most effective approach for identifying driving difficulties among persons with MS.

a Department of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA.

b School of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Health Systems, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Maria T. Schultheis, PhD, Drexel University, Dept of Psychology, 3141 Chestnut St, PSA Building 218, Philadelphia, PA 19104

 Supported by the National Multiple Sclerosis Society (grant no. RG 3353A1/1).

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(09)00161-0

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2008.12.017


View previous. 15 of 32 View next.