A Comparative Evaluation of Inpatient Rehabilitation for Older Adults With Debility, Hip Fracture, and Myopathy
Presented to the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, September 27, 2007, Boston, MA.
Abstract
Kortebein P, Granger CV, Sullivan DH. A comparative evaluation of inpatient rehabilitation for older adults with debility, hip fracture, and myopathy.
Objective
To compare the functional outcomes and discharge location of older adults admitted to inpatient rehabilitation for debility, hip fracture, and myopathy.
Design
Retrospective cohort study from 2002 to 2003 with information from the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation (UDSMR).
Setting
United States inpatient rehabilitation facilities subscribing to the UDSMR.
Participants
Patients 65 years or older (N=84.701) with primary diagnoses of debility (n=14,835), hip fracture (n=68,915), and myopathy (n=951).
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures
Change in functional status, including efficiency (change in functional status divided by length of stay in days) and discharge setting.
Results
The efficiency of the patients with debility (1.7±2.1) was significantly lower than that of the patients with hip fracture (1.9±1.6; P<.001), but not different from the patients with myopathy (1.6±1.4; P=.3). Significantly more patients with debility (68%) were discharged home than the hip fracture and myopathy groups (66% and 65%, respectively; P<.001).
Conclusions
Although statistical differences exist, the functional recovery and rate of discharge home of older adult patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation with a primary debility diagnosis are essentially the same clinically as those of patients with a diagnosis of either hip fracture or myopathy. Given these findings, and given that hip fracture and myopathy are approved medical conditions according to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 75% rule, the medical condition debility warrants consideration for inclusion as a qualifying medical diagnosis under this rule. However, further research is needed to develop relatively objective criteria for the debility diagnosis, and to identify those patients with debility who are most likely to benefit from inpatient rehabilitation.
aCentral Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Little Rock, AR
bDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
cDonald W. Reynolds Department of Geriatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
dUniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY
Reprint requests to Patrick Kortebein, MD, Assistant Professor, PM&R and Geriatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (3J/149), Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, 2200 Fort Roots Dr, North Little Rock, AR 72214
A commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has conferred or will confer a financial benefit on the author or one or more of the authors. Dr. Granger is an employee of Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation (UDSMR), a division of UB Foundation Activities Inc. FIM and UDSMR are trademarks of UDSMR, a division of UB Foundation Activities Inc.