Journal Home
Search for

Volume 90, Issue 5, Pages 733-740 (May 2009)


View previous. 8 of 32 View next.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Sertraline for the Treatment of Depression in Persons With Traumatic Brain Injury

Teresa A. Ashman, PhDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Joshua B. Cantor, PhDa, Wayne A. Gordon, PhDa, Lisa Spielman, PhDc, Steve Flanagan, MDb, Annika Ginsberg, BAd, Clara Engmann, BAa, Matthew Egan, BSa, Felicia Ambrose, MDa, Brian Greenwald, MDa

Abstract 

Ashman TA, Cantor JB, Gordon WA, Spielman L, Flanagan S, Ginsberg A, Engmann C, Egan M, Ambrose F, Greenwald B. A randomized controlled trial of sertraline for the treatment of depression in persons with traumatic brain injury.

Objective

To examine the efficacy of sertraline in the treatment of depression after traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Design

Double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Setting

Research center at a major urban medical center.

Participants

Subjects were a referred and volunteer sample of 52 participants with TBI, a diagnosis of major depression disorder (MDD), and a score on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) of 18 or greater. The majority of the sample was male (58%), had less than 14 years of education (73%), had incomes below $20,000 (82%), and were from minority backgrounds (75%). Approximately one third of the sample had mild brain injuries, and two thirds had moderate to severe brain injuries. The mean age was 47±11, and the mean time since injury was 17±14 years. One participant withdrew from the study because of side effects.

Intervention

Daily oral sertraline in doses starting at 25mg and increasing to therapeutic levels (up to 200mg) or placebo for 10 weeks.

Main Outcome Measures

The HAM-D, the Beck Anxiety Inventory, and the Life-3 quality of life (QOL).

Results

No statistically significant differences were found at baseline between drug and placebo groups on baseline measures of depression (24.8±7.3 vs 27.7±7.0), anxiety (16.4±12.3 vs 24.0±14.9), or QOL (2.96±1.0 vs 2.9±0.9). The income level of those receiving placebo was significantly lower than those participants receiving medication. Analyses of covariance revealed significant changes from preintervention to posttreatment for all 3 outcome measures (P<.001) but no group effects. Random-effects modeling did not find any significant difference in patterns of scores of the outcome measures between the placebo and medication groups.

Conclusions

Both groups showed improvements in mood, anxiety, and QOL, with 59% of the experimental group and 32% of the placebo group responding to the treatment, defined as a reduction of a person's HAM-D score by 50%.

a Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY

b New York University Rusk Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, New York, NY

c Private Consultant, Congers, NY

d Cancer Institute, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Teresa A. Ashman, PhD, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Dept of Rehabilitation, One Gustave L Levy Pl, Box 1240, New York, NY 10029

 Supported by the National Institute of Disability and Rehabilitation Research, United States Department of Education (grant no. H133A020501), and Pfizer Pharmaceutical Company (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00233103).

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(09)00083-5

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2008.11.005


View previous. 8 of 32 View next.