Journal Home
Search for

Volume 90, Issue 3, Pages 440-446 (March 2009)


View previous. 15 of 35 View next.

The Prevalence of Osteoarthritis of the Intact Hip and Knee Among Traumatic Leg Amputees

Pieter A. Struyf, MDabCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Caroline M. van Heugten, PhDacd, Minou W. Hitters, MDa, Rob J. Smeets, MD, PhDace

Abstract 

Struyf PA, van Heugten CM, Hitters MW, Smeets RJ. The prevalence of osteoarthritis of the intact hip and knee among traumatic leg amputees.

Objective

To determine the prevalence of osteoarthritis (OA) in the knee and/or hip of the intact leg among traumatic leg amputees compared with the general population and its relationship with amputation level, time since amputation, age, and mobility.

Design

Cross-sectional observational study.

Setting

Outpatient population of 2 Dutch rehabilitation centers.

Participants

Patients (N=78) with a unilateral traumatic transtibial amputation, knee disarticulation, or transfemoral amputation of at least 5 years ago; ability to walk with a prosthesis; older than 18 years of age; and able to understand Dutch. Patients were excluded if they had bilateral amputations, other pathologies of the knee or hip, or central neurologic pathologies.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measure

The prevalence of OA.

Results

The prevalence of knee OA was 27% (men 28.3%, women 22.2%) and hip OA was 14% (men 15.3%, women 11.1%). This was higher compared with the general population (knee OA men 1.58%, women 1.33%, hip OA men 1.13%, women 0.98%, age adjusted). No significant relationships between the prevalence of OA and level of amputation, time since amputation, mobility, and age were found.

Conclusions

The prevalence of OA is significantly greater for both the knee and hip in the traumatic leg amputee population. No specific risk factors were identified. Although no specific risk factors in this specific population could be identified, it might be relevant to apply commonly known strategies to prevent OA as soon as possible after the amputation.

a Rehabilitation Centre Blixembosch, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

b Maasland Hospital, Sittard, The Netherlands

c Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

d Centre of Excellence in Rehabilitation Medicine, Rudolf Magnus Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands

e Rehabilitation Foundation, Limburg, The Netherlands

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Pieter A. Struyf, MD, Dept of Rehabilitation Medicine, Maasland Hospital, PO Box 5500, 6130 MB Sittard, The Netherlands

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(08)01697-3

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2008.08.220


View previous. 15 of 35 View next.