Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 90, Issue 3 , Pages 463-469 , March 2009

Gait Patterns After Total Hip Arthroplasty and Surface Replacement Arthroplasty

  • Julie Nantel, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Department of Kinesiology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
    • Gait and Posture Laboratory, Marie Enfant Rehabilitation Center, Montreal, Canada
  • ,
  • Nicolas Termoz, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Gait and Posture Laboratory, Marie Enfant Rehabilitation Center, Montreal, Canada
    • UFR STAPS–Université Paris X, Nanterre, France
  • ,
  • Pascal-André Vendittoli, MD, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
  • ,
  • Martin Lavigne, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
  • ,
  • François Prince, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Kinesiology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
    • Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
    • Gait and Posture Laboratory, Marie Enfant Rehabilitation Center, Montreal, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to François Prince, PhD, Dept of Kinesiology, University of Montreal, CP 6128 Centre Ville, Montreal, PQ, Canada H3C 3J7

  • Image Result

    Hip moment and power curves in the sagittal and frontal planes for control, surface hip arthroplasty, and THA groups. The dash-dot lines delimit the phases corresponding to the H2S power burst in the

    Hip moment and power curves in the sagittal and frontal planes for control, surface hip arthroplasty, and THA groups. The dash-dot lines delimit the phases corresponding to the H2S power burst in the sagittal plane and the H3F in the frontal plane. A positive power value indicates an energy generation (concentric contraction), and a negative power value specifies energy absorption (eccentric contraction). The kinetic data were normalized to body weight and reported in percentage of the gait cycle to facilitate the intersubject comparison. The gait cycle was defined from 0% (first heel contact) to 100% (the subsequent ipsilateral heel contact), with the toe-off occurring at 60%. *THA is significantly different from the control and surface hip arthroplasty. †THA and surface hip arthroplasty groups are significantly different from the control group.

 Supported by the Canadian Institute of Health Research training program in mobility and posture disorder (MENTOR) and Zimmer.

 A commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has conferred or will confer a financial benefit on the author or one or more of the authors.

PII: S0003-9993(08)01634-1

doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.08.215

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 90, Issue 3 , Pages 463-469 , March 2009