Journal Home
Search for

Volume 90, Issue 3, Pages 463-469 (March 2009)


View previous. 18 of 35 View next.

Gait Patterns After Total Hip Arthroplasty and Surface Replacement Arthroplasty

Julie Nantel, MScac, Nicolas Termoz, PhDcd, Pascal-André Vendittoli, MD, MScb, Martin Lavigne, MDb, François Prince, PhDabcCorresponding Author Informationemail address

Abstract 

Nantel J, Termoz N, Vendittoli P-A, Lavigne M, Prince F. Gait patterns after total hip arthroplasty and surface replacement arthroplasty.

Objective

To compare gait patterns in patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA) and surface hip arthroplasty.

Design

Observational study.

Setting

Outpatient biomechanical laboratory.

Participants

Two groups of 10 surface hip arthroplasty and THA patients and 10 control subjects participated in the study (N=30). The patients were volunteers recruited from a larger randomized study.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcomes Measures

Gait patterns, hip abductor muscle strength, clinical outcomes, and radiographic analyses were compared between groups.

Results

In the sagittal plane, the THA group showed a larger flexor moment and larger mechanical work in H2S and K3S power bursts compared with surface hip arthroplasty and control subjects. In the frontal plane, both THA and surface hip arthroplasty patients had smaller hip abductor muscles energy generation (H3F) than the control group. No difference was found for the hip abductor muscles strength.

Conclusions

In the THA group, the larger energy absorption in H2S and K3S would be a cost-effective mechanical adaptation to increase stability. The surface hip arthroplasty characteristics could allow the return to a more normative gait pattern compared with THA. The modification in the frontal plane in surface hip arthroplasty and THA would be related to the hip abductor muscles strength.

a Department of Kinesiology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada

b Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada

c Gait and Posture Laboratory, Marie Enfant Rehabilitation Center, Montreal, Canada

d UFR STAPS–Université Paris X, Nanterre, France

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to François Prince, PhD, Dept of Kinesiology, University of Montreal, CP 6128 Centre Ville, Montreal, PQ, Canada H3C 3J7

 Supported by the Canadian Institute of Health Research training program in mobility and posture disorder (MENTOR) and Zimmer.

 A commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has conferred or will confer a financial benefit on the author or one or more of the authors.

PII: S0003-9993(08)01634-1

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2008.08.215


View previous. 18 of 35 View next.