Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 90, Issue 2 , Pages 263-270 , February 2009

Improvement of Gaze Control After Balance and Eye Movement Training in Patients With Progressive Supranuclear Palsy: A Quasi-Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Image Result

    Time interval for vGFS and GEI calculation. (A) Foot (z-axis), head pitch, and vertical eye traces during a platform task. Subject started the task standing and looking straight ahead. The vertical Ga

    Time interval for vGFS and GEI calculation. (A) Foot (z-axis), head pitch, and vertical eye traces during a platform task. Subject started the task standing and looking straight ahead. The vertical Gaze Fixation Score (vGFS) was calculated starting at head pitch until the lag foot departed from the platform (blue arrow). (B) Head pitch velocity for the same trial. The vertical dashed trace indicates peak of head pitch velocity. Actual gaze angle was calculated at the point in time when head pitch velocity peaked down. Abbreviations: deg, degrees; GEI, Gaze Error Index.

  • Image Result
    Vertical gaze fixation score. (A) Average pretest and posttest values for the treatment and comparison groups on vertical Gaze Fixation Score during the step-up activity. Values displayed as means ± S

    Vertical gaze fixation score. (A) Average pretest and posttest values for the treatment and comparison groups on vertical Gaze Fixation Score during the step-up activity. Values displayed as means ± SEs. (B) Individual pretest and posttest values. Each dot represents 1 subject (average of 4 trials). Arrow down indicates direction of improvement. *Significant difference with α<.05.

  • Image Result
    Gaze error index. (A) Average pretest and posttest values for the treatment and comparison groups on Gaze Error Index during the step-up activity. Values displayed as means ± SEs. (B) Individual prete

    Gaze error index. (A) Average pretest and posttest values for the treatment and comparison groups on Gaze Error Index during the step-up activity. Values displayed as means ± SEs. (B) Individual pretest and posttest values. Each dot represents 1 subject (average of 4 trials). Arrow down indicates direction of improvement. *Significant difference with α<.05.

  • Image Result
    Consort-E Flow Chart

    Consort-E Flow Chart

 Supported by the National Institute of Disability and Rehabilitation Research (grant no. H133G030159).

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors are associated.

 Reprints are not available from the author

PII: S0003-9993(08)01603-1

doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.07.024

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 90, Issue 2 , Pages 263-270 , February 2009