Journal Home
Search for

Volume 90, Issue 2, Pages 187-192 (February 2009)


View previous. 5 of 31 View next.

The Immediate Effects of Mobilization Technique on Pain and Range of Motion in Patients Presenting With Unilateral Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Rotsalai Kanlayanaphotporn, PhDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Adit Chiradejnant, PhDa, Roongtiwa Vachalathiti, PhDb

Abstract 

Kanlayanaphotporn R, Chiradejnant A, Vachalathiti R. The immediate effects of mobilization technique on pain and range of motion in patients presenting with unilateral neck pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Objective

To determine the immediate effects on both pain and active range of motion (ROM) of the unilateral posteroanterior (PA) mobilization technique on the painful side in mechanical neck pain patients presenting with unilateral symptoms.

Design

Triple-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Setting

Outpatient physical therapy, institutional clinic.

Participants

Patients (N=60), 2 physical therapists, and 1 assessor involved in this study.

Interventions

The patients were randomly allocated into either preferred or random mobilization group by using an opaque concealed envelope. The first therapist performed the screening, assessing, prescribing the spinal level(s), and the grade of mobilization. The second therapist performed the mobilization treatment according to their allocated group stated in an envelope. The assessor who was blind to the group allocation conducted the measurements of pain and active cervical ROM.

Main Outcome Measures

Pain intensity, active cervical ROM, and global perceived effect were measured at baseline and 5 minutes posttreatment.

Results

After mobilization, there were no apparent differences in pain and active cervical ROM between groups. However, within-group changes showed significant decreases in neck pain at rest and pain on most painful movement (P<0.001) with a significant increase in active cervical ROM after mobilization on most painful movement (P=0.002).

Conclusions

The results of this study did not provide support for the preference of the unilateral PA mobilization on the painful side to the random mobilization.

a Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

b Faculty of Physical Therapy and Applied Movement Science, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand

Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to Rotsalai Kanlayanaphotporn, PhD, Dept of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, 154 Rama 1 Rd, Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand

 Supported by the Thailand Research Fund and the Commission on Higher Education (grant no. MRG4980001).

 Reprints are not available from the author

PII: S0003-9993(08)01584-0

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2008.07.017


View previous. 5 of 31 View next.