Redefining the Manual Wheelchair Stroke Cycle: Identification and Impact of Nonpropulsive Pushrim Contact
Presented to the Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America, June 15–19, 2007, Phoenix, AZ.
Abstract
Kwarciak AM, Sisto SA, Yarossi M, Price R, Komaroff E, Boninger ML. Redefining the manual wheelchair stroke cycle: identification and impact of nonpropulsive pushrim contact.
Objectives
To create a comprehensive definition of the manual wheelchair stroke cycle, which includes multiple periods of pushrim contact, and to show its improved clinical benefit to wheelchair propulsion analyses.
Design
Cross-sectional biomechanics study.
Setting
Three motion analysis laboratories.
Participants
Persons (N=54) with paraplegia who use a manual wheelchair.
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures
Pushrim forces, axle moments, and contact angles measured during wheelchair propulsion.
Results
Total force on the pushrim was used to define pushrim contact and positive axle moment was used to identify the included period of propulsive contact. During most strokes, periods of nonpropulsive contact existed before and after propulsive contact. Within these periods, braking moments were applied to the pushrim, resulting in negative power output, or power loss. Including nonpropulsive data decreased mean stroke moment and power. The magnitude and the angle over which braking moments and power loss occurred increased with wheel speed. Mean braking moment and power loss within the initial contact period were significantly (P<.001) related to stroke pattern.
Conclusions
The proposed definition of the stroke cycle provides a thorough and practical description of wheelchair propulsion. Researchers and clinicians should use this definition to understand and minimize the impact of nonpropulsive contact throughout the stroke.
aKessler Medical Rehabilitation Research and Education Center, West Orange, NJ
bDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ
cDepartment of Rehabilitation Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY
dDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
eHuman Engineering Research Laboratories, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA
fDepartments of Bioengineering and Rehabilitation Science and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
gDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Health System, Pittsburgh, PA
Reprint requests to Andrew M. Kwarciak, MS, Kessler Medical Rehabilitation Research and Education Center, 1199 Pleasant Valley Way, West Orange, NJ 07052
Supported by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (grant no. H133A011107) and by the Henry H. Kessler Foundation.
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors are associated.