Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 90, Issue 1 , Pages 109-117, January 2009

Is the Fear Avoidance Model Associated With the Reduced Level of Aerobic Fitness in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain?

  • Rob J. Smeets, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Rehabilitation Centre Blixembosch, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
    • School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
    • Rehabilitation Foundation Limburg, Hoensbroek, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Rob J. Smeets, MD, PhD, Rehabilitation Foundation Limburg, PO Box 88, 6430 AB Hoensbroek, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Kees D. van Geel, PT

      Affiliations

    • Rehabilitation Centre Blixembosch, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
    • Fysiotherapie Beelen/Medisch trainings centrum Breukelen, Breukelen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Jeanine A. Verbunt, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
    • Rehabilitation Foundation Limburg, Hoensbroek, The Netherlands
    • Department of Psychological Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Abstract 

Smeets RJ, van Geel KD, Verbunt JA. Is the fear avoidance model associated with the reduced level of aerobic fitness in patients with chronic low back pain?

Objectives

To compare aerobic fitness of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) against healthy controls and to assess whether variables of the fear avoidance model are associated with loss of aerobic fitness.

Design

A case-comparison study.

Setting

Rehabilitation centers.

Participants

Patients with CLBP (n=223), and normative data from healthy subjects (n=18,082).

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Maximal oxygen uptake (V̇o2max) was estimated on the basis of a modified submaximal Åstrand bicycle test performed by patients with CLBP (observed level of aerobic fitness) and compared with the normative data of healthy controls matched for age, sex, and level of sport activity (expected level of aerobic fitness). Pain (visual analog scale); disability (Roland Disability Questionnaire); pain-related fear (Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia); depression (Beck Depression Inventory); catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale); and the level of activity during sport, work/household, and leisure time (Baecke Physical Activity Questionnaire) were assessed. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed with the difference of the observed and expected level of aerobic fitness as dependent variable and putative influential factors including those of the fear avoidance model as independent variables.

Results

o2max could be calculated in 175 (78%) of the patients. Both men and women with CLBP had significant lower V̇o2max than expected (10.3mL/kg lean body mass (LBM)×min−1 and 6.5mL/kg LBM×min−1, respectively; P<.001). The levels of activity during leisure time and work/household were significantly associated with this reduced level of aerobic fitness. However, the variables of the fear avoidance model were not.

Conclusions

Most patients with CLBP-associated disability have a lower level of aerobic fitness, but this is not associated with fear avoidance.

Key Words: Exercise, Low back pain, Rehabilitation

List of Abbreviations: BDI, Beck Depression Inventory, BPAQ, Baecke Physical Activity Questionnaire, CLBP, chronic low back pain, LBM, lean body mass, LBP, low back pain, o2max, maximal oxygen consumption, MET, metabolic equivalent, PCS, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, RDQ, Roland Disability Questionnaire, TSK, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, VIF, variance inflation factor

 

 Supported by Zorgonderzoek Nederland/Medische Wetenschappen (grant no. 014-32-007).

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(08)01506-2

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2008.07.009

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 90, Issue 1 , Pages 109-117, January 2009