Journal Home
Search for

Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages 118-126 (January 2009)


View previous. 21 of 34 View next.

Exercises for Spine Stabilization: Motion/Motor Patterns, Stability Progressions, and Clinical Technique

Stuart M. McGill, PhDCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Amy Karpowicz, BSc, MPT

Abstract 

McGill SM, Karpowicz A. Exercises for spine stabilization: motion/motor patterns, stability progressions, and clinical technique.

Objective

To quantify several forms of the curl-up, side-bridge, and birddog exercises (muscle activity and 3-dimensional [3D] spine position) including some corrective techniques to assist clinical decision-making.

Design

A basic science study of a convenience sample with a retest of expert intervention.

Setting

Spine Biomechanics Laboratory/Research Clinic.

Participants

Healthy men (N=8) performed the exercises, and 5 subjects repeated the exercises as an expert applied corrective techniques.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Surface electromyography of selected trunk and hip muscles together with video analysis and 3D spine posture were collected.

Results

Comparison of muscle activation levels showed there were justifiable progressions in each exercise form. In general, bracing of the abdominal wall enhanced activation of the obliques, but different techniques caused migration of muscle activity to other muscles. Examples of specific findings include the following. Movement during these traditionally isometric exercises such as drawing squares with the hand/foot while in the birddog posture enhances activation of many muscle groups. Breathing while holding the isometric exercises had differing effects on muscle activation which was exercise dependent. Some corrective exercise techniques, such as fascial raking, substantially changed relative activation between muscles in the abdominal wall.

Conclusions

The data presented in this study may be used to guide the clinical decision process when choosing a specific exercise form together with selecting the correct starting level, a logical progression, suitable dosage, and possible corrective technique to enhance tolerance of a patient.

Department of Kinesiology, Spine Biomechanics Laboratory, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Stuart M. McGill, PhD, Spine Biomechanics Laboratory, Dept of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave West, Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L 3G1

 Supported by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(08)01505-0

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2008.06.026


View previous. 21 of 34 View next.