Journal Home
Search for

Volume 89, Issue 12, Supplement, Pages S69-S76 (December 2008)


View previous. 13 of 15 View next.

Long-Term Cognitive Outcome in Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Meta-Analysis Examining Timed and Untimed Tests at 1 and 4.5 or More Years After Injury

Lesley Ruttan, PhD, CPsychaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Krystle Martin, MAc, Anita Liu, HBSca, Brenda Colella, MAa, Robin E. Green, PhD, CPsychab

Abstract 

Ruttan L, Martin K, Liu A, Colella B, Green RE. Long-term cognitive outcome in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis examining timed and untimed tests at 1 and 4.5 or more years after injury.

Objectives

To examine long-term outcome of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) on timed and untimed cognitive tests using meta-analysis.

Design

Meta-analysis examining outcome at 2 epochs, 6 to 18 months postinjury (epoch 1) and 4.5 to 11 years postinjury (epoch 2).

Setting

Data source was published articles (1966–2007) identified through electronic and manual search.

Participants

A total of 1380 subjects with moderate to severe TBI participated in the 16 studies meeting inclusion criteria.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Timed and untimed neuropsychologic tests with quantitative results (means, SDs, t, and df tests) from studies containing a healthy comparison group and a mean time since injury falling within 1 of the 2 epochs.

Results

Patient versus control weighted effect sizes were medium to large at epoch 1 for both untimed tasks (r=−.46; confidence interval [CI], −.32 to −.65) and timed tasks (r=−.46; CI, −.35 to −.59). At epoch 2, effect sizes were slightly smaller for untimed tasks (r=−.38; CI, −.25 to −.60) and timed tasks (r=−.40; CI, −.32 to −.62).

Conclusions

Patients showed robust, persisting impairments on both timed and untimed tests at recovery plateau (ie, 6–18mo postinjury) and many years later. These findings converge with previous studies, though using an alternative approach that obviates some of the methodologic problems of longitudinal studies, such as selective attrition.

a Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada

b Graduate Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

c Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Lesley Ruttan, PhD, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, 345 Rumsey Rd, Toronto, ON, M4G 1R7, Canada

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(08)01476-7

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2008.07.007


View previous. 13 of 15 View next.