Volume 89, Issue 12 , Pages 2373-2374, December 2008
Prevalence of Osteoporosis in Osteoarthritic Patients Undergoing Total Hip or Total Knee Arthroplasty
Abstract
Labuda A, Papaioannou A, Pritchard J, Kennedy C, DeBeer J, Adachi JD. Prevalence of osteoporosis in osteoarthritic patients undergoing total hip or total knee arthroplasty.
Objective
To determine the prevalence of osteoporosis in osteoarthritic patients undergoing total hip or total knee arthroplasty.
Design
Cross-sectional study.
Setting
The Specialized Outpatient Rehabilitation Service's (SORS) Pre-surgical Arthroplasty Service located at the Chedoke Hospital, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Participants
SORS outpatients (N=364), from the period of March 2006 to March 2007.
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures
Prevalence of osteoporosis was determined by review of a self-reported survey, and defined by (1) self-reported diagnosis of osteoporosis, (2) history of fragility fracture (defined by a bone fracture occuring as a result of a fall from standing height or less after the age of 50), or (3) current treatment for osteoporosis using bisphosphonates.
Results
Of the study cohort, 26% were classified as having osteoporosis, according to our criteria. Of the patients with self-reported osteoporosis or a history of fragility fractures, only 37% and 17% reported current treatment with bisphosphonates, respectively.
Conclusions
Osteoporosis is common in the osteoarthritic arthroplasty population, with a prevalence at least equal to that in the general population. Due to the self-reported nature of the study, the prevalence of osteoporosis in this population is likely significantly higher. Results from this study indicate need for further research, specifically in formal assessment for osteoporosis in patients undergoing a joint replacement.
Key Words: Osteoarthritis, Osteoporosis, Prevalence, Rehabilitation
List of Abbreviations: BMD, bone mineral density, CaMos, Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study, OA, osteoarthritis
Supported by the Hamilton Health Sciences.
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors are associated.
Published online November 1, 2008 at www.archives-pmr.org.
PII: S0003-9993(08)00837-X
doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2008.06.007
© 2008 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 89, Issue 12 , Pages 2373-2374, December 2008
