Journal Home
Search for

Volume 89, Issue 11, Pages 2129-2139 (November 2008)


View previous. 16 of 434 View next.

A Computerized Adaptive Test for Patients With Hip Impairments Produced Valid and Responsive Measures of Function

Dennis L. Hart, PT, PhDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Ying-Chih Wang, OT, PhDac, Paul W. Stratford, PT, MSd, Jerome E. Mioduski, MSb

Abstract 

Hart DL, Wang Y-C, Stratford PW, Mioduski JE. A computerized adaptive test for patients with hip impairments produced valid and responsive measures of function.

Objectives

To describe the use of a computerized adaptive test (CAT) in routine clinical practice and evaluate content coverage and construct validity, sensitivity to change, and responsiveness of hip CAT functional status (FS) measures.

Design

Longitudinal, prospective observational cohort study.

Setting

Two hundred fifty-seven outpatient rehabilitation clinics in 31 states (United States).

Participants

Two samples were examined: intake and discharge rehabilitation FS data from patients (N=8714) treated for hip impairments between January 2005 and June 2007 and data from patients (N=444) used to develop the hip CAT were examined for comparison (2002–2004).

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Hip functional status and global rating of change.

Results

The CAT used on average 7 items to produce precise estimates of FS that adequately covered the content range with negligible floor and slight ceiling effects. Test information functions and SEs supported FS measure precision. FS measures discriminated patients in clinically logical ways. Sixty-one percent of patients obtained discharge FS measures greater than or equal to minimal detectable change (95% confidence intervals). Change of 6 FS units (scale: 0–100) represented minimal clinically important improvement, which 64% of patients obtained.

Conclusions

The hip CAT was efficient; produced valid, responsive measures of FS for patients receiving therapy for hip impairments; and functioned well in routine clinical application but would benefit from more difficult items.

Key WordRehabilitation

a Department of Consulting and Research, Focus On Therapeutic Outcomes, Inc, Knoxville, TN

b Department of Information Technology, Focus On Therapeutic Outcomes, Inc, Knoxville, TN

c Sensory Motor Performance Program, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL

d Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Toronto, ON, Canada

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Dennis L. Hart, PT, PhD, Director of Consulting and Research, Focus On Therapeutic Outcomes, Inc, 551 Yopps Cove Rd, White Stone, VA, 22578-2403

 Supported by Focus On Therapeutic Outcomes, Inc.

 A commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has conferred or will confer a financial benefit on the author or 1 or more of the authors. Hart, Wang, and Mioduski are employees of and Hart is an investor in Focus On Therapeutic Outcomes, Inc, which distributes the hip CAT discussed in this study.

PII: S0003-9993(08)00829-0

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2008.04.026


View previous. 16 of 434 View next.