Journal Home
Search for

Volume 89, Issue 11, Pages 2080-2085 (November 2008)


View previous. 9 of 434 View next.

Power-Assisted Wheels Ease Energy Costs and Perceptual Responses to Wheelchair Propulsion in Persons With Shoulder Pain and Spinal Cord Injury

Mark S. Nash, PhDabdCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Daan Koppens, MDf, Mirjam van Haaren, MDf, Andrew L. Sherman, MDb, James P. Lippiatte, John E. Lewis, PhDc

Abstract 

Nash MS, Koppens D, van Haaren M, Sherman AL, Lippiatt JP, Lewis JE. Power-assisted wheels ease energy costs and perceptual responses to wheelchair propulsion in persons with shoulder pain and spinal cord injury.

Objective

Test effects of pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchairs (PAPAWs) on the energetics and perceptual responses to steady-state and intensity-graded wheelchair propulsion in persons with paraplegia and tetraplegia having chronic shoulder pain.

Design

Test, retest with a control condition.

Setting

Academic medical center.

Participants

Subjects (N=18) aged 19 to 70 years with chronic, motor-complete paraplegia and tetraplegia having confirmed shoulder pain.

Interventions

Study participants underwent testing on 4 randomized nonconsecutive days during either 6 minutes of steady-state or 12 minutes of intensity-graded wheelchair propulsion on stationary rollers. Participants used their own manual wheelchair and either their customary wheels or power-assist wheels attached with an axle bracket.

Main Outcome Measures

Oxygen consumption (V̇o2, L/min), distance (m), energy cost (L/m), and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE; Borg Categorical 6–20 Scale) were measured during propulsion.

Results

Significant main effects of testing were observed for V̇o2, heart rate, and RPE in both subject groups. Distances propelled were significantly increased in both groups across both tests and in each of their 2-minute exercise stages.

Conclusions

Use of PAPAWs by persons with paraplegia and tetraplegia having shoulder pain significantly lowers energy cost responses and perceived exertion compared with manual wheelchair propulsion while significantly increasing the distanced propelled.

a Department of Neurological Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL

b Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL

c Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL

d Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL

e Department of Physical Therapy, Jackson Memorial Rehabilitation Center, Miami, FL

f Department of Physiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Mark S. Nash, PhD, The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Lois Pope Life Center, 1095 NW 14th Terrace, R-48, Miami, FL, 33136

 Supported by the Miami Project to Cure Paralysis.

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(08)00801-0

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2008.05.018


View previous. 9 of 434 View next.