Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 89, Issue 11 , Pages 2057-2065 , November 2008

Control of a Six Degree of Freedom Prosthetic Arm After Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Surgery

Presented to the Myoelectric Controls Symposium, August 15–19, 2005, New Brunswick, Canada, and the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics, July 29–August 3, 2007, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

  • Laura A. Miller, PhD, CP

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
    • Neural Engineering Center for Artificial Limbs, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Laura A. Miller, PhD, CP, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, 345 E Superior St, Room 1309, Chicago, IL 60611
  • ,
  • Robert D. Lipschutz, CP

      Affiliations

    • Neural Engineering Center for Artificial Limbs, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL
  • ,
  • Kathy A. Stubblefield, OT

      Affiliations

    • Neural Engineering Center for Artificial Limbs, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL
  • ,
  • Blair A. Lock, MS

      Affiliations

    • Neural Engineering Center for Artificial Limbs, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL
  • ,
  • He Huang, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
    • Neural Engineering Center for Artificial Limbs, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL
  • ,
  • T. Walley Williams III, MA

      Affiliations

    • Liberating Technologies, Inc, Holliston, MA
  • ,
  • Richard F. Weir, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
    • Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
    • Biomechatronics Development Laboratory, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL
  • ,
  • Todd A. Kuiken, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
    • Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
    • Neural Engineering Center for Artificial Limbs, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL

  • Image Result

    On subject's left side: (A) The 3-DOF prosthesis consisting of nonpowered locking shoulder, passive humeral rotator, powered elbow, powered wrist rotator, and powered hook terminal device; (B) The 6-D

    On subject's left side: (A) The 3-DOF prosthesis consisting of nonpowered locking shoulder, passive humeral rotator, powered elbow, powered wrist rotator, and powered hook terminal device; (B) The 6-DOF prosthesis consisting of powered shoulder, humeral rotator, elbow, wrist rotator, wrist flexor, and hand.

  • Image Result
    Marker configuration used in motion analysis. A total of 14 markers were used: 3 infrared reflective markers were placed on each rigid segment of the 6-function prosthesis: at the socket, the prosthet

    Marker configuration used in motion analysis. A total of 14 markers were used: 3 infrared reflective markers were placed on each rigid segment of the 6-function prosthesis: at the socket, the prosthetic upper-limb, the forearm, and the hand, and 2 additional markers were placed on the tip of thumb and index finger of the prosthetic hand for calculating the hand open and close motion.

  • Image Result
    Timed tasks: (A) cubbies, (B) cups, (C) Box and Blocks, and (D) clothespin relocation task.

    Timed tasks: (A) cubbies, (B) cups, (C) Box and Blocks, and (D) clothespin relocation task.

  • Image Result
    Images of the subject reaching to his head to put on or take off a baseball cap.

    Images of the subject reaching to his head to put on or take off a baseball cap.

  • Image Result
    Four plots indicating the simultaneous control of elbow flexion/extension and hand open and close. (A) Task: elbow flexion + hand opening, (B) Task: elbow extension + hand close, (C) Task: elbow flexi

    Four plots indicating the simultaneous control of elbow flexion/extension and hand open and close. (A) Task: elbow flexion + hand opening, (B) Task: elbow extension + hand close, (C) Task: elbow flexion + hand close, (D) Task: elbow extension + hand opening. Both joints were controlled by electromyographic control signal activity over targeted muscle reinnervation muscles.

  • Image Result
    Frontal view of endpoint trajectory while the subject was performing circle drawing task. To remove any artifact from body movement impacting the graph, the point of reference is marker located on the

    Frontal view of endpoint trajectory while the subject was performing circle drawing task. To remove any artifact from body movement impacting the graph, the point of reference is marker located on the shoulder (which was not actuated by the subject in this test).

  • Image Result
    Joint phase plot between elbow flexion/extension angle and shoulder flexion/extension angle while the subject was performing (A) arm reaching up task and then (B) arm retracting. Zero in the vertical

    Joint phase plot between elbow flexion/extension angle and shoulder flexion/extension angle while the subject was performing (A) arm reaching up task and then (B) arm retracting. Zero in the vertical axis for elbow flexion and extension denotes full elbow extension. Horizontal and vertical lines indicate a single DOF moving, whereas slope areas are the phases of coactivation or joint synergy (ie, 2 joints moving together). The red stars indicate the initial joint position.

 Supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child and Human Development (grant no. R01 HD043137-01), and the Keiser Family Foundation.

 A commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has conferred or will confer a financial benefit on the author or one or more of the authors. Williams III is an employee of Liberating Technologies, Inc, maker of the Boston Digital Arm, used in this study. This component was purchased by the Neural Engineering Center for Artificial Limbs from Liberating Technologies, Inc for this study.

PII: S0003-9993(08)00795-8

doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.05.016

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 89, Issue 11 , Pages 2057-2065 , November 2008