Journal Home
Search for

Volume 89, Issue 10, Pages 1873-1879 (October 2008)


View previous. 8 of 234 View next.

Evidence of Beneficial Effect of Physical Therapy After Lower-Extremity Trauma

Presented to the Academy Health Annual Research Meeting, June 26–28, 2005, Boston, MA.

for the LEAP Study GroupRenan C. Castillo, PhDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Ellen J. MacKenzie, PhDa, Kristin R. Archer, PT, MS, DPTb, Michael J. Bosse, MDc, Lawrence X. Webb, MDd

Abstract 

Castillo RC, MacKenzie EJ, Archer KR, Bosse MJ, Webb LX, for the LEAP Study Group. Evidence of beneficial effect of physical therapy after lower-extremity trauma.

Objective

To examine the effect of physical therapy (PT) use on a range of measures of physical impairment in a cohort of patients with lower-extremity trauma.

Design

Longitudinal, observational study of patients with severe lower-extremity trauma. Patients were interviewed by a research coordinator and examined by an orthopedic surgeon and a physical therapist during initial admission and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postdischarge.

Setting

Eight level I trauma centers.

Participants

Patients (N=382) whose legs were salvaged after limb-threatening trauma to the lower limb.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Unmet need for PT was assessed from 2 perspectives: an orthopedic surgeon and a physical therapist independently evaluated each patient and were asked whether the patient would benefit from PT. Patients classified by these health professionals as needing PT services over a given period and who reported receiving no PT at the end of that period were classified as having unmet need as evaluated by the orthopedic surgeon or physical therapist for that follow-up period. Multiple variable regression techniques were used to compare improvement in 5 measures of physical impairment and functional limitation between the met and unmet need groups over the periods of 3 to 6, 6 to 12, and 12 to 24 months: percentage of impairment in knee and ankle range of motion (ROM), reciprocal stair climbing pattern, gait deviations when walking, self-selected walking speed greater than 1.2m/s (4ft/s), and the mobility subscores of the FIM instrument.

Results

Patients with unmet need for PT as assessed by a physical therapist were statistically significantly less likely to improve in all 5 of the selected domains of physical impairment and functional limitation than patients whose PT need was met. These results remained constant after adjustment for patient sociodemographic, personality, and social resources, as well as injury and treatment characteristics, reported pain intensity, and impairment level at the beginning of the study period. Patients with unmet need for PT as evaluated by an orthopedic surgeon were significantly worse off than patients with met need in only 1 of the 5 selected measures (ROM).

Conclusions

The results are consistent with a beneficial effect of PT after lower-extremity trauma. The results point to a need for improved standards for the prescription of PT services, and highlight the importance of involving a PT professional in the prescribing process.

a Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD

b Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD

c Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC

d the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Renan C. Castillo, PhD, Center for Injury Research and Policy, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N Broadway, Room 544, Baltimore, MD 21205

 Supported by the National Institutes of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health (grant no. RO1-AR42659).

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(08)00464-4

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2008.01.032


View previous. 8 of 234 View next.