Volume 89, Issue 10 , Pages 1965-1969, October 2008
Bilateral Frontal Plane Mechanics After Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty
Abstract
Milner CE, O'Bryan ME. Bilateral frontal plane mechanics after unilateral total knee arthroplasty.
Objective
To compare frontal plane knee mechanics among the operated and nonoperated limbs after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and a healthy control limb.
Design
A cross-sectional analysis with age-matched control group.
Setting
A biomechanics and sports medicine laboratory.
Participants
Subjects (n=16; 8 men, 8 women; mean age, 61±7y; height, 1.71±0.10m; weight, 87.5±15.1kg) and age-matched healthy controls (n=16; 8 men, 8 women; mean age, 63±7y; height, 1.7±.09m; weight 72.5±13.9kg).
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures
Peak knee adduction angle, first peak knee adduction moment, and the frontal plane knee angle and moment at loading peak during the stance phase of walking.
Results
Peak knee adduction angle (P=.176), and the frontal plane knee angle (P=.116) and moment (P=.260) at loading peak were similar across the operated, nonoperated, and healthy control limbs. The first peak knee adduction moment was higher in the nonoperated limb when compared with the operated limb and with the healthy control (P=.003). First peak knee adduction moment was similar in the operated knee and the healthy control.
Conclusions
The greater first peak knee adduction moment in the nonoperated knee indicates a possible mechanism for the predictable deterioration of this knee after unilateral TKA of the contralateral knee.
Key Words: Adult, Aged, Arthroplasty, Replacement, knee, Gait, Kinematics, Kinetics, Rehabilitation
List of Abbreviations: ES, effect size, OA, osteoarthritis, TKA, total knee arthroplasty
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors are associated.
PII: S0003-9993(08)00438-3
doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2008.02.034
© 2008 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 89, Issue 10 , Pages 1965-1969, October 2008
