Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 89, Issue 10 , Pages 1907-1912, October 2008

Poststroke Upper-Limb Rehabilitation Using 5 to 7 Inserted Microstimulators: Implant Procedure, Safety, and Efficacy for Restoration of Function

  • Ross Davis, MD

      Affiliations

    • Alfred Mann Foundation, Santa Clarita, CA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Ross Davis, MD, Alfred Mann Foundation, 25134 Rye Canyon Loop, Santa Clarita, CA 91355
  • ,
  • Owen Sparrow, FRCS

      Affiliations

    • Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
  • ,
  • Gregoire Cosendai, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Alfred Mann Foundation, Santa Clarita, CA
  • ,
  • Jane H. Burridge, PhD

      Affiliations

    • University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
  • ,
  • Christian Wulff, MD

      Affiliations

    • Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
  • ,
  • Ruth Turk, MSc

      Affiliations

    • University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
  • ,
  • Joseph Schulman, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Alfred Mann Foundation, Santa Clarita, CA

published online 01 September 2008.

Abstract 

Davis R, Sparrow O, Cosendai G, Burridge JH, Wulff C, Turk R, Schulman J. Poststroke upper-limb rehabilitation using 5 to 7 inserted microstimulators: implant procedure, safety, and efficacy for restoration of function.

Objective

To investigate the feasibility of implanting microstimulators to deliver programmed nerve stimulation for sequenced muscle activation to recover arm-hand functions.

Design

By using a minimally invasive procedure and local anesthesia, 5 to 7 microstimulators can be safely and comfortably implanted adjacent to targeted radial nerve branches in the arm and forearm of 7 subjects with poststroke paresis. The microstimulators' position should remain stable with no tissue infection and can be programmed to produce effective personalized functional muscle activity with no discomfort for a preliminary 12-week study. Clinical testing, before and after the study, is reported in the accompanying study.

Setting

Microstimulator implantations in a sterile operating room.

Participants

Seven adults, with poststroke hemiparesis of 12 months or more.

Intervention

Under local anesthesia, a stimulating probe was inserted to identify radial nerve branches. Microstimulators were inserted by using an introducer and were retrievable for 6 days by attached suture. Each device was powered via a radiofrequency link from 2 external cuff coils connected to a control unit.

Main Outcome Measures

To achieve low threshold values at the target sites with minimal implant discomfort. Microstimulators and external equipment were monitored over 12 weeks of exercise.

Results

Seven subjects were implanted with 41 microstimulators, 5 to 7 per subject, taking 3.5 to 6 hours. Implantation pain levels were 20% more than anticipated. No infections or microstimulator failures occurred. Mean nerve thresholds ranged between 4.0 to 7.7μcoulomb/cm2/phase over 90 days, indicating that cathodes were within 2 to 4mm of target sites. In 1 subject, 2 additional microstimulators were inserted.

Conclusions

Microstimulators were safely implanted with no infection or failure. The system was reliable and programmed effectively to perform exercises at home for functional restoration.

Key Words: Arm, Prosthesis implantation, Radial nerve, Rehabilitation, Stroke

List of Abbreviations: LHT, lateral head of the triceps, MHT, medial head of the triceps

 

 Supported by the Alfred Mann Foundation.

 A commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article may confer a financial benefit on the author or one or more of the authors. The Alfred Mann Foundation is developing the radiofrequency microstimulator used in this study. Davis and Cosendai are consultants to the Alfred Mann Foundation; Schulman was an employee of the Alfred Mann Foundation while the study was conducted.

 Published online August 29, 2008 at www.archives-pmr.org.

PII: S0003-9993(08)00432-2

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2008.05.010

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 89, Issue 10 , Pages 1907-1912, October 2008