Journal Home
Search for

Volume 89, Issue 8, Pages 1454-1459 (August 2008)


View previous. 9 of 40 View next.

Feasibility of a Classification System for Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, and Sports Therapy Interventions for Mobility and Self-Care in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation

Sacha A. van Langeveld, PTabCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Marcel W. Post, PhDb, Floris W. van Asbeck, MD, PhDb, Karin Postma, PT, MScc, Jacqueline Leenders, OTb, Kees Pons, MDc

Abstract 

van Langeveld SA, Post MW, van Asbeck FW, Postma K, Leenders J, Pons K. Feasibility of a classification system for physical therapy, occupational therapy, and sports therapy interventions for mobility and self-care in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

Objective

To test the feasibility of a classification system developed to record the contents of treatment sessions intended to improve mobility and self-care by persons with a spinal cord injury (SCI) in clinical rehabilitation.

Design

Descriptive study.

Setting

Three Dutch SCI facilities.

Participants

Participants (N=36) as well as physical therapists (n=20), occupational therapists (n=14), and sports therapists (n=2).

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Questionnaires to assess the clarity of the classification system, time needed to record 1 treatment session, and the distribution of categories and interventions. The classification system consisted of 28 categories at 3 levels of functioning: basic functions (eg, muscle power), basic activities (eg, transfers), and complex activities (eg, walking and moving around outside).

Results

Therapists used 1625 codes to record 856 treatment sessions of 142 patients. For 93% of the treatment sessions, the coding caused little or no doubt. The therapists were able to classify 86.3% of the treatment sessions within 3 minutes. The classification system was rated as useful and easy to use.

Conclusions

The findings support the suitability of our classification system as a tool to record the contents of SCI treatment sessions in different settings and by different therapists.

a Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands

b Rehabilitation Centre De Hoogstraat, Utrecht, The Netherlands

c Rehabilitation Centre Rijndam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Sacha A. van Langeveld, PT, Rehabilitation Centre De Hoogstraat, PO Box 85238, 3508 AE Utrecht, Rembrandtkade 10, Utrecht, 3583 TM, The Netherlands

 Supported by the Rehabilitation Center De Hoogstraat, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(08)00353-5

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.12.044


View previous. 9 of 40 View next.