Volume 89, Issue 7 , Pages 1300-1304, July 2008
The Influence of Psychologic Factors on Diskography in Patients With Chronic Axial Low Back Pain
Abstract
Derby R, Lee S-H, Chen Y, Kim B-J, Lee C-H, Hong Y-K, Lee J-E, Seo K-S. The influence of psychologic factors on diskography in patients with chronic axial low back pain.
Objective
To determine whether a patient's presenting psychometric scores affect the findings of a pressure and injection speed–controlled manometric lumbar diskography in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP).
Design
A prospective, correlation-based, investigative study.
Setting
Free-standing ambulatory spine surgery center.
Participants
Two hundred sixty-three disks from 81 patients (54 men, 27 women).
Intervention
Diskography was performed using pressure and injection speed–controlled techniques. The patients were divided into psychometric subgroups (normal, at risk, abnormal) according to the Distress and Risk Assessment Method (DRAM).
Main Outcome Measures
The diskography findings on each psychometric DRAM subgroup were evaluated.
Results
Across the individual psychometric categories, the positive rates of diskography in the normal, at-risk, and abnormal subgroups were 75.0% (9/12), 59.5% (25/42), and 70.4% (19/27), respectively (P>.05). The mean numeric rating scores of pain at 15 and 50psi above the opening pressure were similar in the 3 psychometric subgroups. There was no correlation between the diskography results and the psychometric subgroupings.
Conclusions
In patients with CLBP, there is no correlation between the presenting psychometric DRAM score and the findings from pressure and injection speed–controlled manometric lumbar diskography.
Key Words: Intervertebral disk, Low back pain, Psychometrics, Rehabilitation
List of Abbreviations: CLBP, chronic low back pain, CT, computed tomography, DRAM, Distress and Risk Assessment Method, MRI, magnetic resonance imaging, MSPQ, Modified Somatic Pain Questionnaire, NRS, numeric rating scale, ZSDS, Zung Self-Rated Depression Scale
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.
PII: S0003-9993(08)00231-1
doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.043
© 2008 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 89, Issue 7 , Pages 1300-1304, July 2008
