Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 89, Issue 7 , Pages 1237-1245, July 2008

A Comparison of Bilateral and Unilateral Upper-Limb Task Training in Early Poststroke Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Presented in part to the UK Stroke Forum, December 7, 2006, Harrogate, UK, and the World Confederation of Physical Therapy Congress, June 4, 2007, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

  • Jacqui H. Morris, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Alliance for Self-Care Research, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
    • Departments of Physiotherapy, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK.
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Jacqui H. Morris, MSc, Clinical Research Fellow, Alliance for Self-Care Research, University of Dundee, 11 Airlie Pl, Dundee DD1 4HJ, UK
  • ,
  • Frederike van Wijck, PhD

      Affiliations

    • School of Health Sciences, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK
  • ,
  • Sara Joice, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Alliance for Self-Care Research, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
  • ,
  • Simon A. Ogston, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Community Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
  • ,
  • Ingrid Cole, BSc

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Physiotherapy, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK.
  • ,
  • Ronald S. MacWalter, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK

Abstract 

Morris JH, van Wijck F, Joice S, Ogston SA, Cole I, MacWalter RS. A comparison of bilateral and unilateral upper-limb task training in early poststroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial.

Objective

To compare the effects of bilateral task training with unilateral task training on upper-limb outcomes in early poststroke rehabilitation.

Design

A single-blinded randomized controlled trial, with outcome assessments at baseline, postintervention (6wk), and follow-up (18wk).

Setting

Inpatient acute and rehabilitation hospitals.

Participants

Patients were randomized to receive bilateral training (n=56) or unilateral training (n=50) at 2 to 4 weeks poststroke onset.

Intervention

Supervised bilateral or unilateral training for 20 minutes on weekdays over 6 weeks using a standardized program.

Main Outcome Measures

Upper-limb outcomes were assessed by Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), Rivermead Motor Assessment upper-limb scale, and Nine-Hole Peg Test (9HPT). Secondary measures included the Modified Barthel Index, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Nottingham Health Profile. All assessment was conducted by a blinded assessor.

Results

No significant differences were found in short-term improvement (0−6wk) on any measure (P>.05). For overall improvement (0−18wk), the only significant between-group difference was a change in the 9HPT (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.0−0.1; P=.05) and ARAT pinch section (95% CI, 0.3−5.6; P=.03), which was lower for the bilateral training group. Baseline severity significantly influenced improvement in all upper-limb outcomes (P<.05), but this was irrespective of the treatment group.

Conclusions

Bilateral training was no more effective than unilateral training, and in terms of overall improvement in dexterity, the bilateral training group improved significantly less. Intervention timing, task characteristics, dose, and intensity of training may have influenced the results and are therefore areas for future investigation.

Key Words: Cerebrovascular accident, Motor activity, Randomized controlled trial, Rehabilitation, Upper extremity

List of Abbreviations: ADLs, activities of daily living, ANOVA, analysis of variance, ARAT, Action Research Arm Test, CI, confidence interval, HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HRQOL, health-related quality of life, 9HPT, Nine-Hole Peg Test, MBI, Modified Barthel Index, NHP, Nottingham Health Profile, RMA, Rivermead Motor Assessment, RCT, randomized controlled trial

 

 Supported by the Chief Scientist Office, Scottish Executive Health Department (grant no. CHZ/4/80).

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(08)00212-8

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.039

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 89, Issue 7 , Pages 1237-1245, July 2008