Volume 89, Issue 5 , Pages 950-957, May 2008
The Predictive Validity of a Brief Inpatient Neuropsychologic Battery for Persons With Traumatic Brain Injury
Abstract
Hanks RA, Millis SR, Ricker JH, Giacino JT, Nakese-Richardson R, Frol AB, Novack TA, Kalmar K, Sherer M, Gordon WA. The predictive validity of a brief inpatient neuropsychologic battery for persons with traumatic brain injury.
Objective
To examine the predictive validity of a brief neuropsychologic test battery consisting of the Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test, the California Verbal Learning Test–II, Trail-Making Test (TMT), Symbol Digit Modalities Test, grooved pegboard, phonemic and categorical word generation tasks, the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (WTAR), and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test–64 relative to functional outcome at 1 year in persons with traumatic brain injury.
Design
Inception cohort study. Follow-up period of 12 months.
Setting
Seven Traumatic Brain Injury Model System centers. Neuropsychologic testing was conducted during the acute inpatient rehabilitation stay and functional outcome measures were obtained at 1-year outpatient follow-up.
Participants
Adults (N=174) who met criteria for admission to inpatient brain injury rehabilitation.
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures
FIM instrument, Disability Rating Scale, Supervision Rating Scale, Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS), and Glasgow Outcome Scale−Extended.
Results
Multiple regression analyses revealed that performance on the neuropsychologic test battery was predictive of outcome at 1 year postinjury for all outcome measures, except FIM motor scores and the SWLS. Cognitive performance using this battery was found to predict 1-year outcomes above and beyond functional variables and injury severity variables collected during inpatient rehabilitation, thereby indicating incremental validity for this test battery. Individual tests that were found to be significant predictors of 1-year outcomes included the WTAR and TMT part B.
Conclusions
These findings support the clinical utility and ecological validity of this battery with respect to level of disability, functional independence, and supervision required.
Key Words: Brain injuries, Neuropsychological tests, Outcomes assessment (health care), Psychometrics, Rehabilitation
Supported by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (grant nos. H133A020501, H133A020502, H133A020509, H133A020514, H133A020515, H133A020518, H133A020526).No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.
PII: S0003-9993(08)00167-6
doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2008.01.011
© 2008 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 89, Issue 5 , Pages 950-957, May 2008
