Journal Home
Search for

Volume 89, Issue 6, Pages 1066-1073 (June 2008)


View previous. 13 of 40 View next.

Factors Affecting Self-Reported Pain and Physical Function in Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis

Riikka Juhakoski, MDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Seppo Tenhonen, MDa, Tapio Anttonen, MDc, Timo Kauppinen, MDb, Jari P. Arokoski, MD, DMedScd

Abstract 

Juhakoski R, Tenhonen S, Anttonen T, Kauppinen T, Arokoski JP. Factors affecting self-reported pain and physical function in patients with hip osteoarthritis.

Objective

To determine the factors associated with self-reported pain and physical function in patients with hip osteoarthritis (OA).

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting

Rehabilitation clinic in a Finnish hospital.

Participants

Participants with hip OA (N=118; 35 men, 83 women; age, 66.7±6.5y; range, 55–80y).

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Self-reported pain and self-reported disease-specific physical function were recorded by using the Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. Self-reported generic physical function was analyzed by using the Finnish version of the RAND 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey. As listed in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health model, the effects of personal factors (age, sex, education, depression, life satisfaction, smoking, years of sporting activities), pathophysiologic factors (radiologic score of hip OA, body mass index [BMI], comorbidities, duration of knee pain) and body functions and structures (measurement of leg extensor power, passive internal rotation and flexion of the hip joint, the six-minute walk test [6MWT], Timed Up & Go [TUG] test, ten-meter walk test, sock test) were analyzed.

Results

The educational level (r=−.264, P<.001), comorbidities (r=.313, P<.001), and BMI (r=.252, P<.001) were identified as significant factors for self-reported disease-specific physical function as well as the educational level (r=.291, P<.001), life-satisfaction (r=−.319, P<.001), BMI (r=−.290, P<.001), and comorbidities (r=−.220, P<.005) for the self-reported generic physical function. No direct relationship with the pain and psychologic factors was detected. The number of comorbidities and duration of knee pain and life satisfaction explained 22% of self-reported pain. The number of comorbidities, passive hip flexion, and the TUG test explained 20% of self-reported disease-specific physical function whereas the passive hip flexion, 6MWT, and educational level explained 25% of self-reported generic physical function.

Conclusions

Educational level, life satisfaction, and number of comorbidities were identified as significant factors for both self-reported pain and physical functioning in hip OA. Performance measures are better predictors of physical function than pain in hip OA. Factors explaining disability and pain in hip OA are multidimensional and no single predicting factor was found to be superior to any other.

a Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Mikkeli Central Hospital, Mikkeli, Finland

b Department of Clinical Radiology, Mikkeli Central Hospital, Mikkeli, Finland

c Mikkeli Health Centre, Mikkeli, Finland

d Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Kuopio University Hospital, and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Kuopio, Kuopio, Finland.

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Riikka Juhakoski, MD, Dept of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Mikkeli Central Hospital, Porrassalmenkatu 35-37, FIN-50100 Mikkeli, Finland

 Supported in part by Mikkeli Central Hospital (EVO grant).

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(08)00142-1

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.10.036


View previous. 13 of 40 View next.