Volume 89, Issue 5 , Pages 856-864, May 2008
The Effectiveness of Progressively Increasing Stimulation Frequency and Intensity to Maintain Paralyzed Muscle Force During Repetitive Activation in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury
Abstract
Chou L-W, Lee SC, Johnston TE, Binder-Macleod SA. The effectiveness of progressively increasing stimulation frequency and intensity to maintain paralyzed muscle force during repetitive activation in persons with spinal cord injury.
Objective
To compare the effectiveness of progressively increasing stimulation intensity, progressively increasing frequency, or progressively increasing both frequency and intensity on paralyzed quadriceps femoris muscle force maintenance during repetitive activation.
Design
Factorial design with different stimulation protocols as independent variables.
Setting
A muscle performance laboratory.
Participants
People (N=8) with spinal cord injury (SCI) (age, 14.63±1.77y).
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measure
Number of contractions when the peak force was 90% or more of a subject's maximal twitch force.
Results
The protocol involving progressively increasing stimulation intensity and then frequency generated more successful contractions (189.88±53.33) than progressively increasing the frequency followed by intensity (122.75±26.56 contractions). Regardless of the order, progressively increasing both intensity and frequency generated more successful contractions than progressively increasing intensity (97 contractions) or frequency (62 contractions) alone.
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that during repetitive electric activation, progressively increasing both stimulation frequency and intensity can produce more successful contractions than progressively increasing only frequency or intensity. These findings can help researchers and clinicians design more effective stimulation protocols for persons with SCI during functional electric stimulation applications.
Key Words: Electric stimulation, Rehabilitation, Spinal cord injuries
Supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant no. HD-36379).
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.
PII: S0003-9993(08)00111-1
doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.10.027
© 2008 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 89, Issue 5 , Pages 856-864, May 2008
