Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 89, Issue 5 , Pages 815-821, May 2008

A Comparison of the Physiologic Effects of Acute Whole-Body Vibration Exercise in Young and Older People

  • Darryl J. Cochrane, MPhEd

      Affiliations

    • Sport Management & Coaching, Department of Management, Massey University, Palmerston North, NZ
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Darryl J. Cochrane, MPhEd, Dept of Management, Massey University Private Bag 11, Palmerston North, NZ 222
  • ,
  • Francesco Sartor, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Biophysical and Clinical Research into Human Movement, Manchester Metropolitan University, Alsager, Cheshire, UK.
  • ,
  • Keith Winwood, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Biophysical and Clinical Research into Human Movement, Manchester Metropolitan University, Alsager, Cheshire, UK.
  • ,
  • Stephen R. Stannard, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Food, Nutrition and Human Health, Massey University, Palmerston North, NZ
  • ,
  • Marco V. Narici, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Biophysical and Clinical Research into Human Movement, Manchester Metropolitan University, Alsager, Cheshire, UK.
  • ,
  • Jörn Rittweger, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Biophysical and Clinical Research into Human Movement, Manchester Metropolitan University, Alsager, Cheshire, UK.

Abstract 

Cochrane DJ, Sartor F, Winwood K, Stannard SR, Narici MV, Rittweger J. A comparison of the physiologic effects of acute whole-body vibration exercise in young and older people.

Objective

To examine the acute physiologic effects of acute whole-body vibration (WBV) exercise in young and older people.

Design

Every participant performed 9 conditions in a static squat position, consisting of no vibration and WBV at 30Hz and 3 loads corresponding to (1) no load (0% body mass), (2) load of 20% body mass, and (3) load of 40% body mass. A Jendrassik voluntary contraction was also performed with no vibration and WBV at 30Hz with no load and 20% body mass.

Setting

Laboratory facilities at a university in the United Kingdom.

Participants

Healthy young people (n=12; 6 men, 6 women; mean age, 21.5y) and 12 healthy older people (6 men, 6 women; mean age, 69.2y) from the local community.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

The Physical Activity Questionnaire, anthropometric measures, counter-movement jump, and isometric maximal voluntary contraction with the Jendrassik maneuver were assessed in both groups. Oxygen uptake (V̇o2), blood pressure, heart rate, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were recorded during WBV and load conditions as the outcome of the study.

Results

Both vibration and load were associated with an increase (P<.001) in V̇o2 for older and young groups. WBV elicited the equivalent of a .35 metabolic equivalent (MET) increase in V̇o2, with additional loads of 20% and 40% body mass increasing V̇o2 by 0.8 and 1.2 METs, respectively. Additionally, there was an interaction effect of vibration and group in which the WBV-related V̇o2 increase was less in the old compared with the young. Both vibration and load caused an increase in heart rate, blood pressure, and RPE (all P<.001); however, there were no significant group differences between young and older groups. The Jendrassik maneuver elicited an increase in V̇o2 by 27.6% for the old and 33% for the young group (P<.001); however, there was no significant difference between groups.

Conclusions

o2 significantly increased in both the older and young people with vibration and additional load and when the Jendrassik maneuver was superimposed with vibration and load. However, the elicited increase in V̇o2 (1.2mL·kg−1·min−1) from WBV may be an insufficient stimulus to improve cardiovascular fitness.

Key Words: Elderly, frail, Exercise, Oxygen, Rehabilitation

 

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(08)00069-5

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.09.055

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 89, Issue 5 , Pages 815-821, May 2008