Rasch Analysis of the Barthel Index in the Assessment of Hospitalized Older Patients After Admission for an Acute Medical Condition
Abstract
de Morton NA, Keating JL, Davidson M. Rasch analysis of the Barthel Index in the assessment of hospitalized older patients after admission for an acute medical condition.
Objective
To investigate the validity of item score summation for the original and modified versions of the Barthel Index.
Design
Rasch analysis of Barthel Index data.
Setting
General medical wards at 2 acute care hospitals in Australia.
Participants
Consecutive older medical patients (N=396).
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures
Activity limitation was assessed by using the Barthel Index at hospital admission and discharge. At 1 hospital site, the original Barthel Index was used, and at the other hospital site the Modified Barthel Index (MBI) was used.
Results
More than half of the items showed misfit to the Rasch model for both versions of the Barthel Index. The continence items appear to measure a different construct to the other items. After the removal of the continence items, data for the remaining items still did not fit the Rasch model. Neither the original nor the MBI are unidimensional scales. An exception to this occurred when the original Barthel Index was rescored and only then for discharge and not for admission Barthel Index data.
Conclusions
Because clinicians do not typically rescore outcomes obtained by using the Barthel Index, these findings, combined with unacceptable ceiling effects, render the Barthel Index an assessment tool with limited validity for measuring and monitoring the health of older medical patients.
aDepartment of Physiotherapy, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
bSchool of Physiotherapy, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia.
Reprint requests to Natalie A. de Morton, PhD, Dept of Physiotherapy, School of Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University-Peninsula Campus, PO Box 527, Frankston, Victoria, Australia 3199
Supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (Dora Lush Postgraduate Scholarship no. 280632).
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.
ABSTRACT