Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 89, Issue 3 , Pages 449-456, March 2008

Effects of Ankle Joint Mobilizations in Adults Poststroke: A Pilot Study

Presented in part as a poster to the Combined Sections Meeting, American Physical Therapy Association, February 1−4, 2006, San Diego, CA, and as a platform to the Kansas Physical Therapy Association, April 1, 2006, Wichita, KS.

  • Patricia M. Kluding, PT, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Patricia M. Kluding, PT, PhD, Mailstop 3051, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS 66160
  • ,
  • Marcio Santos, PT, PhD

Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS.

Abstract 

Kluding PM, Santos M. Effects of ankle joint mobilizations in adults poststroke: a pilot study.

Objective

To compare the effect of 2 interventions on ankle mobility, ankle kinematics, and weight-bearing symmetry during functional activities in subjects with hemiparesis after a stroke.

Design

Randomized trial.

Setting

Academic medical center.

Participants

A convenience sample of 16 subjects with hemiparesis after stroke (mean age, 55.2y; mean time since stroke, 21.4mo).

Intervention

Subjects received 8 sessions over 4 weeks of either functional task practice combined with ankle joint mobilizations, or functional task practice only.

Main Outcome Measures

Changes in ankle range of motion (ROM) (not blinded), ankle kinematics during sit-to-stand (STS) and gait, and lower-extremity weight-bearing symmetry during STS and static standing.

Results

The combined intervention group gained 5.7°±3.1° in passive ankle ROM compared with 0.2°±2.6° in the functional practice only group (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5–8.6; P<.01). No significant changes in ankle kinematics or weight bearing during static standing were noted in either group. The functional practice group decreased differences in weight bearing during STS by 9.5%±6.47%, whereas the combined intervention group increased this difference by 3.37%±5.29% (95% CI, 3.26–19.46; P=.01).

Conclusions

The increase in ankle motion did not improve joint kinematics and may have prevented improvement in weight-bearing symmetry.

Key Words: Biomechanics, Cerebrovascular accident, Musculoskeletal manipulations, Range of motion, articular, Rehabilitation

 

 Supported by the School of Allied Health Research Committee, University of Kansas Medical Center.

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(07)01853-9

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.12.005

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 89, Issue 3 , Pages 449-456, March 2008