Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 89, Issue 4 , Pages 602-608 , April 2008

Sensory Stimulation Augments the Effects of Massed Practice Training in Persons With Tetraplegia

Preliminary results of this study were presented to the American Paraplegia Society, September 2005, in Las Vegas, NV.

  • Kristina S. Beekhuizen, PhD, PT

      Affiliations

    • Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Miami, FL
    • Department of Physical Therapy, Nova Southeastern University, Ft. Lauderdale, FL.
  • ,
  • Edelle C. Field-Fote, PhD, PT

      Affiliations

    • The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
    • Department of Physical Therapy, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Edelle C. Field-Fote, PhD, PT, The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1095 NW 14 Ter (R-48), Miami, FL 33136.

References 

  1. Colyer RA, Kappelman B. Flexor pollicis longus tenodesis in quadriplegia at the sixth cervical level. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63:376–379
  2. Snoek GJ, IJzerman MJ, Hermens HJ, Maxwell D, Biering-Sorensen F. Survey of the needs of patients with spinal cord injury: impact and priority for improvement in hand function in tetraplegics. Spinal Cord. 2004;42:526–532
  3. National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center. Spinal cord injury: facts and figures at a glance. http://www.spinalcord.uab.eduUpdated June 2006, Accessed February 11, 2008
  4. Green JB, Sora E, Bialy Y, Ricamato A, Thatcher RW. Cortical sensorimotor reorganization after spinal cord injury: an electroencephalographic study. Neurology. 1998;50:1115–1121
  5. Blanton S, Wolf SL. An application of upper-extremity constraint-induced movement therapy in a patient with subacute stroke. Phys Ther. 1999;79:847–853
  6. Dromerick AW, Edwards DF, Hahn M. Does the application of constraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischemic stroke?. Stroke. 2000;31:2984–2988
  7. Levy CE, Nichols DS, Schmalbrock PM, Keller P, Chakeres DW. Functional MRI evidence of cortical reorganization in upper-limb stroke hemiplegia treated with constraint-induced movement therapy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80:4–12
  8. Liepert J, Bauder H, Wolfgang HR, Miltner WH, Taub E, Weiller C. Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke. 2000;31:1210–1216
  9. Liepert J, Miltner WH, Bauder H, et al. Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients. Neurosci Lett. 1998;250:5–8
  10. Nelles G, Jentzen W, Jueptner M, Müller S, Diener HC. Arm training induced brain plasticity in stroke studied with serial positron emission tomography. Neuroimage. 2001;13(6 Pt 1):1146–1154
  11. Wolf SL, Blanton S, Baer H, Breshears J, Butler AJ. Repetitive task practice: a critical review of constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke. Neurologist. 2002;8:325–338
  12. Hoffman LR, Field-Fote EC. Cortical reorganization following bimanual training and somatosensory stimulation in cervical spinal cord injury: a case report. Phys Ther. 2007;87:208–223
  13. Beekhuizen KS, Field-Fote EC. Massed practice versus massed practice with stimulation: effects on upper extremity function and cortical plasticity in individuals with incomplete cervical spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005;19:33–45
  14. Nudo RJ. Role of cortical plasticity in motor recovery after stroke. Neurol Rep. 1998;22(2):61–67
  15. Miltner WH, Bauder H, Sommer M, Dettmers C, Taub E. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: a replication. Stroke. 1999;30:586–592
  16. Darian-Smith I, Burman K, Darian-Smith C. Parallel pathways mediating manual dexterity in the macaque. Exp Brain Res. 1999;128:101–108
  17. Ridding MC, Brouwer B, Miles TS, Pitcher JB, Thompson PD. Changes in muscle responses to stimulation of the motor cortex induced by peripheral nerve stimulation in human subjects. Exp Brain Res. 2000;131:135–143
  18. Conforto AB, Kaelin-Lang A, Cohen LG. Increase in hand muscle strength of stroke patients after somatosensory stimulation. Ann Neurol. 2002;51:122–125
  19. Conforto AB, Cohen LG, dos Santos RL, Scaff M, Marie SK. Effects of somatosensory stimulation on motor function in chronic cortico-subcortical strokes. J Neurol. 2007;254:333–339
  20. Green JB, Sora E, Bialy Y, Ricamato A, Thatcher RW. Cortical motor reorganization after paraplegia: an EEG study. Neurology. 1999;53:736–743
  21. Page SJ, Gater DR, Bach-Y-Rita P. Reconsidering the motor recovery plateau in stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1377–1381
  22. American Spinal Injury Association, International Medical Society of Paraplegia. International standards for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. Chicago: American Spinal Injury Association; 2000;
  23. van Tuijl JH, Janssen-Potten YJ, Seelen HA. Evaluation of upper extremity motor function tests in quadriplegics. Spinal Cord. 2002;40:51–64
  24. Morris DM, Uswatte G, Crago JE, Cook E, Taub E. The reliability of the Wolf Function Test for assessing upper extremity function in stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:750–755
  25. Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer AL, Morgan B, Piacentino A. Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32:1635–1639
  26. Whitall J, Waller SM, Silver KH, Macko RF. Repetitive bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing improves motor function in chronic hemiparetic stroke. Stroke. 2000;31:2390–2395
  27. Rosen B, Lundborg G. A model instrument for the documentation of outcome after nerve repair. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2000;25:535–543
  28. Rossini PM, Pauri F. Neuromagnetic integrated methods tracking human brain mechanisms of sensorimotor areas ‘plastic’ reorganization. Brain Res Rev. 2000;33:131–154
  29. Panizza M, Nilsson J, Roth BJ, Basser PJ, Hallet M. Relevance of stimulus duration for activation of motor and sensory fibers: implications for the study of H-reflexes and magnetic stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992;85:22–29
  30. Field-Fote EC. Electrical stimulation modifies spinal and cortical neural circuitry. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2004;32:155–160

 Supported by The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, and the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Miami, FL.

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(07)01814-X

doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.021

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 89, Issue 4 , Pages 602-608 , April 2008