« Previous
Next »
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 89, Issue 4
, Pages
602-608
, April 2008
Sensory Stimulation Augments the Effects of Massed Practice Training in Persons With Tetraplegia
-
Hand function outcomes. Subjects in the MP+SS, MP, and SS groups each differed significantly from the subjects in the control group in JTHFT scores. Subjects in the MP+SS group also differed significa
Hand function outcomes. Subjects in the MP+SS, MP, and SS groups each differed significantly from the subjects in the control group in JTHFT scores. Subjects in the MP+SS group also differed significantly from the MP and SS groups. Legend: open bar is mean pretest values ± SEM; closed bar is mean post-test values ± SEM. *P≤.01; †P≤.001.
-
Upper-extremity function outcomes. Subjects in the MP+SS group differed significantly from the subjects in the MP, SS, and control groups in WMFT scores. Subjects in the SS group differed significantlUpper-extremity function outcomes. Subjects in the MP+SS group differed significantly from the subjects in the MP, SS, and control groups in WMFT scores. Subjects in the SS group differed significantly from the control group. Legend: open bar is mean pretest values ± SEM; closed bar is mean post-test values ± SEM. *P≤.01; †P≤.001.
-
Pinch strength outcomes. Subjects in the MP+SS and SS groups differed significantly from the control group in pinch grip force scores. Legend: open bar is mean pretest values ± SEM; closed bar is meanPinch strength outcomes. Subjects in the MP+SS and SS groups differed significantly from the control group in pinch grip force scores. Legend: open bar is mean pretest values ± SEM; closed bar is mean post-test values ± SEM. *P≤.01.
-
Sensory function outcomes. Subjects in the MP+SS and SS groups had significant increases in Semmes-Weinstein monofilament scores. Subjects in the MP and control groups did not demonstrate a significanSensory function outcomes. Subjects in the MP+SS and SS groups had significant increases in Semmes-Weinstein monofilament scores. Subjects in the MP and control groups did not demonstrate a significant change. Legend: open bar is mean percent change ± SEM. *P≤.01.
-
Cortical motor threshold outcomes. Subjects in the MP+SS and MP groups differed significantly from the subjects in the control group in MEP threshold values. Legend: open bar is mean pretest values ±Cortical motor threshold outcomes. Subjects in the MP+SS and MP groups differed significantly from the subjects in the control group in MEP threshold values. Legend: open bar is mean pretest values ± SEM; closed bar is mean posttest values ± SEM. *P≤.001.
Supported by The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, and the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Miami, FL.
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.
PII: S0003-9993(07)01814-X
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.021
© 2008 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 89, Issue 4
, Pages
602-608
, April 2008
