Journal Home
Search for

Volume 89, Issue 3, Pages 457-462 (March 2008)


View previous. 15 of 40 View next.

The Use of the Analytic Hierarchy Process to Aid Decision Making in Acquired Equinovarus Deformity

Janine A. van Til, MScabCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Gerbert J. Renzenbrink, MDc, James G. Dolan, MDde, Maarten J. IJzerman, PhDab

Abstract 

van Til JA, Renzenbrink GJ, Dolan JG, IJzerman MJ. The use of the analytic hierarchy process to aid decision making in acquired equinovarus deformity.

Objective

To increase the transparency of decision making about treatment in patients with equinovarus deformity poststroke.

Design

The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used as a structured methodology to study the subjective rationale behind choice of treatment.

Setting

An 8-hour meeting at a centrally located rehabilitation center in The Netherlands, during which a patient video was shown to all participants (using a personal computer and a large screen) and the patient details were provided on paper.

Participants

A panel of 10 health professionals from different backgrounds.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

The performance of the applicable treatments on outcome, impact, comfort, cosmetics, daily effort, and risks and side effects of treatment, as well as the relative importance of criteria in the choice of treatment.

Results

According to the model, soft-tissue surgery (.413) ranked first as the preferred treatment, followed by orthopedic footwear (.181), ankle-foot orthosis (.147), surface electrostimulation (.137), and finally implanted electrostimulation (.123). Outcome was the most influential consideration affecting treatment choice (.509), followed by risk and side effects (.194), comfort (.104), daily effort (.098), cosmetics (.065), and impact of treatment (.030).

Conclusions

Soft-tissue surgery was judged best on outcome, daily effort, comfortable shoe wear, and cosmetically acceptable result and was thereby preferred as a treatment alternative by the panel in this study. In contrast, orthosis and orthopedic footwear are usually preferred in daily practice. The AHP method was found to be suitable methodology for eliciting subjective opinions and quantitatively comparing treatments in the absence of scientific evidence.

a Roessingh Research and Development, Enschede, The Netherlands

b University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

c Roessingh Rehabilitation Center, Enschede, The Netherlands

d Unity Health System, Rochester, NY

e University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.

Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to Janine A. van Til, MSc, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands

 Supported by ZONmw (grant no. 14350026).

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.

Reprints are not available from the author.

PII: S0003-9993(07)01798-4

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.09.030


View previous. 15 of 40 View next.