The Use of the Analytic Hierarchy Process to Aid Decision Making in Acquired Equinovarus Deformity
Abstract
van Til JA, Renzenbrink GJ, Dolan JG, IJzerman MJ. The use of the analytic hierarchy process to aid decision making in acquired equinovarus deformity.
Objective
To increase the transparency of decision making about treatment in patients with equinovarus deformity poststroke.
Design
The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used as a structured methodology to study the subjective rationale behind choice of treatment.
Setting
An 8-hour meeting at a centrally located rehabilitation center in The Netherlands, during which a patient video was shown to all participants (using a personal computer and a large screen) and the patient details were provided on paper.
Participants
A panel of 10 health professionals from different backgrounds.
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures
The performance of the applicable treatments on outcome, impact, comfort, cosmetics, daily effort, and risks and side effects of treatment, as well as the relative importance of criteria in the choice of treatment.
Results
According to the model, soft-tissue surgery (.413) ranked first as the preferred treatment, followed by orthopedic footwear (.181), ankle-foot orthosis (.147), surface electrostimulation (.137), and finally implanted electrostimulation (.123). Outcome was the most influential consideration affecting treatment choice (.509), followed by risk and side effects (.194), comfort (.104), daily effort (.098), cosmetics (.065), and impact of treatment (.030).
Conclusions
Soft-tissue surgery was judged best on outcome, daily effort, comfortable shoe wear, and cosmetically acceptable result and was thereby preferred as a treatment alternative by the panel in this study. In contrast, orthosis and orthopedic footwear are usually preferred in daily practice. The AHP method was found to be suitable methodology for eliciting subjective opinions and quantitatively comparing treatments in the absence of scientific evidence.
Correspondence to Janine A. van Til, MSc, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
Supported by ZONmw (grant no. 14350026).
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.