« Previous
Next »
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 89, Issue 3
, Pages 435-440
, March 2008
Hospital Disposition After Stroke in a National Survey of Acute Cerebrovascular Diseases in Israel
References
- . Heart disease and stroke statistics—2004 update. Dallas: American Heart Association; 2003;
- . Care of patients with cerebral stroke in general hospitals in Israel: the perspective of professionals. Jerusalem: JDC-Brookdale Institute of Gerontology and Human Development; 1999;
- Management of adult stroke rehabilitation care: a clinical practice guideline. Stroke. 2005;36:e100–e143
- . Prediction of hospital disposition after thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke using the National Institutes of Health stroke scale. Arch Neurol. 2004;61:1061–1064
- . Disposition after acute stroke: who is not sent home from hospital?. Neuroepidemiology. 1998;17(1):21–29
- . Cost-effectiveness of integrated stroke services. QJM. 2005;98:415–425
- . Home or hospital for stroke rehabilitation? Results of a randomized controlled trial: I: health outcomes at 6 months. Stroke. 2000;31:1024–1031
- . Home or hospital for stroke rehabilitation? Results of a randomized controlled trial: II: cost minimization analysis at 6 months. Stroke. 2000;31:1032–1037
- Allocation and preference of patients for domiciliary or institutional rehabilitation after a stroke. Int J Rehabil Res. 2004;27:155–158
- Utility of the NIH stroke scale as a predictor of hospital disposition. Stroke. 2003;34:134–137
- Predictors of resource use after acute hospitalization (The Northern Manhattan Stroke Study). Neurology. 2000;55:1180–1187
- . Recovery rates after stroke and their impact on outcome prediction. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2000;14:229–235
- Criteria for referral of CVA patients to rehabilitation. Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl. 1985;12:143–147
- A national survey of acute cerebrovascular disease in Israel: burden, management, outcome and adherence to guidelines. Isr Med Assoc J. 2006;8:3–7
- Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989;20:864–870
- . Comparison of neurological scales and scoring systems for acute stroke prognosis. Stroke. 1996;27:1817–1820
- . Outcome measures in acute stroke trials: a systematic review and some recommendations to improve practice. Stroke. 2000;31:1429–1438
- . Modification of Rankin Scale: recovery of motor function after stroke. Stroke. 1988;19:1497–1500
- . Multinomial logit models. Proc SAS Users Group Int. 1995;20:1227–1234
- . Trend of stroke hospitalization, United States, 1988–1997. Stroke. 2001;32:2221–2226
- . Post-stroke follow-up in a rehabilitation center outpatient clinic. Isr Med Assoc J. 2004;6:603–606
- . Rehabilitation after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1677–1684
- . Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: issues for consideration. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:823–830
- . Does the organization of postacute stroke care really matter?. Stroke. 2001;32:268–274
- . Diagnosis and therapy in acute stroke: a rehabilitation center viewpoint. [Hebrew] Harefuah. 2001;140:1–488
- . Stroke rehabilitation services to accelerate hospital discharge and provide home-based care: an overview and cost analysis. Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20:537–552
- . A randomized controlled trial of early supported discharge and continued rehabilitation at home after stroke: five-year follow-up of patient outcome. Stroke. 2005;36:297–303
- . Stroke rehabilitation units: concepts, evaluation, and unresolved issues. Stroke. 1985;16:178–181
- . Evaluation of a clinical score for prognostic stratification of elderly stroke patients. Age Ageing. 1994;23:492–499
- . So stroke units save lives: where do we go from here?. BMJ. 1994;309:1273–1277
- . Role of stroke rehabilitation units in managing severe disability after stroke. Stroke. 1995;26:2031–2034
- . Patients with severe stroke benefit most by interdisciplinary rehabilitation team approach. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2005;20:258–263
- . Functional measures of first stroke in-patient rehabilitation: the use of the FIM total score with a clinical rationale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:630–635
- . Rehabilitation outcomes in brain tumors and stroke: a comparative study of inpatient rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;85:568–573
- . Rehabilitation services funding and rehabilitation outcomes: does one affect the other?. Crit Rev Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;18:173–186
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.
PII: S0003-9993(07)01744-3
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.001
© 2008 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 89, Issue 3
, Pages 435-440
, March 2008
