Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 89, Issue 3 , Pages 470-479 , March 2008

Effectiveness Evaluation of a Remote Accessibility Assessment System for Wheelchair Users Using Virtualized Reality

Presented to the Rehabilitation Engineering Society of North American, June 2006, Atlanta, GA.

  • Jongbae Kim, PhD

      Affiliations

    • VA Center of Excellence in Wheelchairs and Associated Rehabilitation Engineering and the Human Engineering Research Laboratories, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA
    • Departments of Rehabilitation Science and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to Jongbae Kim, PhD, c/o Christine Heiner, Human Engineering Research Laboratories, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System (151R-1), 7180 Highland Dr, Bldg 4, 2nd Fl E, Pittsburgh, PA 15206
  • ,
  • David M. Brienza, PhD

      Affiliations

    • VA Center of Excellence in Wheelchairs and Associated Rehabilitation Engineering and the Human Engineering Research Laboratories, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA
    • Departments of Rehabilitation Science and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
  • ,
  • Robert D. Lynch

      Affiliations

    • Lynch & Associates, Architects, Pittsburgh, PA.
  • ,
  • Rory A. Cooper, PhD

      Affiliations

    • VA Center of Excellence in Wheelchairs and Associated Rehabilitation Engineering and the Human Engineering Research Laboratories, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA
    • Departments of Rehabilitation Science and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
  • ,
  • Michael L. Boninger, MD

      Affiliations

    • VA Center of Excellence in Wheelchairs and Associated Rehabilitation Engineering and the Human Engineering Research Laboratories, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA
    • Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

References 

  1. McNeil JM. Prevalence of disabilities and associated health conditions among adults—United States. MMWR Morb Mort Wkly Rep. 1999;50:120–125
  2. Cooper RA, Cooper R. Trends and issues in wheeled mobility technologies. In: Space Requirements for Wheeled Mobility Workshop: An International Workshop; 2003 Oct 9-11; Buffalo (NY). Available at: http://www.ap.buffalo.edu/idea/Space%20Workshop/index2.asp. Accessed Oct 25, 2007.
  3. In:  Brandt EN,  Pope AM editor. Enabling America: assessing the role of rehabilitation science and engineering. Washington (DC): Natl Acad Pr; 1997;
  4. LaPlante LM. Demographics of wheeled mobility device users. In: Space Requirements for Wheeled Mobility Workshop: An International Workshop; 2003 Oct 9-11; Buffalo (NY). Available at: http://www.ap.buffalo.edu/idea/Space%20Workshop/index2.asp. Accessed Oct 25, 2007.
  5. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, U.S. Census Bureau. American housing survey for the United States, supplement. Washington (DC): U.S. Government Printing Office; 1995;Current Housing Reports, Series H151/95
  6. Struyk RJ, Katsura H. Aging at home: how the elderly adjust their housing without moving. J Housing Elder. 1987;4:1–192
  7. Pope AM, Tarlov AR. Disability in America: toward a national agenda for prevention. Washington (DC): Natl Acad Pr; 1991;
  8. Sanford JA, Pynoos J, Tejral A, Brown A. Development of comprehensive assessment for delivery of home modifications. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 2002;20:43–55
  9. Burns RB, Crislip D, Daviou P, et al. Using telerehabilitation to support assistive technology. Assist Technol. 1998;10:126–133
  10. Sanford JA, Jones M, Daviou P, Grogg K, Butterfield T. Using telerehabilitation to identify home modification needs. Assist Technol. 2004;16:43–53
  11. Pynoos J, Sanford JA, Rosenfelt TA. Team approach for home modification. AOT Pract. 2002;159:
  12. Kanade T, Narayanan PJ, Rander PW. Virtualized reality: concepts and early results. In: IEEE Workshop on the Representation of Visual Scenes; 1995 June 24; Boston (MA). p 69-76.
  13. Ponce J̇, Genc Y, Sullivan S. Constructing geometric object models from images. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; 2000 Apr; San Francisco (CA). p 871-8.
  14. Pratt T. From photo to 3D model. IEEE Rev. 2000;46:9–12
  15. Cooper RA, Fitzgerald SG, Boninger ML, et al. Telerehabilitation: expanding access to rehabilitation expertise. Proc IEEE. 2001;89:1174–1193
  16. Cooper RA, Ding D, Simpson R, et al. Virtual reality and computer-enhanced training applied to wheeled mobility: an overview of work in Pittsburgh. Assist Technol. 2005;17:159–170
  17. Durlach NI, Mavor AS. Virtual reality: scientific and technological challenges. Washington (DC): National Research Council; 1995;
  18. Lathan CE, Kinsella A, Rosen MJ, Winters J, Trepagnier C. Aspects of human factors engineering in home telemedicine and telerehabilitation systems. Telemed J. 1999;5:169–175
  19. Kim J, Brienza DM. The virtual reality telerehabilitation system for analyzing accessibility of the physical environment: a comparison of camera systems. In: Proceedings of the RESNA 26th International Conference; 2003 June 19-23; Atlanta (GA).
  20. Kim J, Brienza DM. The virtual reality telerehabilitation system for analyzing accessibility of the physical environment: a feasibility test. In: Proceedings of the RESNA 28th International Conference; 2005 June 25-27; Atlanta (GA).
  21. Kim J, Brienza DM. Development of a virtual reality telerehabilitation system for analyzing accessibility of the built environment. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006;43:257–272
  22. Kim J. Development and effectiveness evaluation of a virtualized reality telerehabilitation system for accessibility analysis of built environment [dissertation]. Pittsburgh: Univ Pittsburgh; 2005;
  23. Kim J, Brienza DM. The virtual reality telerehabilitation system for analyzing accessibility of the physical environment: a field test. In: Proceedings of the RESNA 29th International Conference; 2006 June 22-26; Atlanta (GA).
  24. Karlovits P. Home renovations make life easier for the physically challenged. Pittsburgh Tribune-Review 2003; Feb 28 http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/search/s_120925.htmlAccessed Oct 29, 2007
  25. Uebersax JS. Structural analysis of diagnostic disagreements. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1983;171:199–206

 Supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Rehabilitation Research and Development Service (grant nos. B3142C, B2159T).

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

 Reprints are not available from the author.

PII: S0003-9993(07)01739-X

doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.158

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 89, Issue 3 , Pages 470-479 , March 2008