« Previous
Next »
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 89, Issue 2
, Pages
291-296
, February 2008
Validation of an Adapted Falls Efficacy Scale in Older Rehabilitation Patients
-
Relationships between FES scores (range, 0−120; higher scores indicate higher confidence) and (A) POMA scores (range, 0−28; higher scores indicate better gait and balance), (B) GDS scores (range, 0−15
Relationships between FES scores (range, 0−120; higher scores indicate higher confidence) and (A) POMA scores (range, 0−28; higher scores indicate better gait and balance), (B) GDS scores (range, 0−15; higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms), and (C) performance in BADLs (range, 0−6; higher scores indicate higher independence). Shaded areas correspond to the 95% CIs around regression line.
Supported in part by the Swiss National Scientific Foundation (grant no. 3252BO-100416) and the Leenaards Foundation.
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.
PII: S0003-9993(07)01693-0
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.152
© 2008 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 89, Issue 2
, Pages
291-296
, February 2008
