« Previous
Next »
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 89, Issue 2
, Pages
304-310
, February 2008
Gait Asymmetry in Community-Ambulating Stroke Survivors
-
A between-subject comparison illustrating the positive correlation between overall temporal symmetry and temporal swing symmetry (solid diamonds) at the preferred velocity (r=.94, df=52, P<.001) and t
A between-subject comparison illustrating the positive correlation between overall temporal symmetry and temporal swing symmetry (solid diamonds) at the preferred velocity (r=.94, df=52, P<.001) and temporal stance symmetry (open squares) at the preferred velocity (r=
−.77, df=52, P<.001). -
A between-subject comparison illustrating the negative correlation between preferred walking velocity and the overall temporal symmetry ratio at this speed (r=−.583, df=52, P<.001). Each object represA between-subject comparison illustrating the negative correlation between preferred walking velocity and the overall temporal symmetry ratio at this speed (r=−.583, df=52, P<.001). Each object represents 1 of the 54 participants and each shape represents a temporal symmetry category: severe asymmetry (triangles), mild asymmetry (squares) and normative symmetry (diamonds). Horizontal dashed lines represent the normative range for temporal symmetry (0.9–1.1) based on a 95% CI around the mean temporal symmetry for 24 healthy control participants walking overground. Objects highlighted by a circle represent those subjects who also displayed spatial step asymmetry.
-
Between-subject comparisons illustrating the negative correlation between the overall temporal symmetry ratio at the preferred gait speed and (A) CMSA foot score (r=−.628, df=35, P<.001) and (B) CMSABetween-subject comparisons illustrating the negative correlation between the overall temporal symmetry ratio at the preferred gait speed and (A) CMSA foot score (r=
−.628, df=35, P<.001) and (B) CMSA leg score (r=
−.644, df=35, P<.001). Each shape represents a temporal symmetry category, severe asymmetry (triangles), mild asymmetry (squares), and normative symmetry (diamonds).
Supported by the Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Marguerite Harland Smith Bursary, Lois Snelling Bursary, and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant no. MOP62957).
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.
PII: S0003-9993(07)01649-8
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.142
© 2008 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 89, Issue 2
, Pages
304-310
, February 2008
