Volume 89, Issue 2 , Pages 304-310, February 2008
Gait Asymmetry in Community-Ambulating Stroke Survivors
Abstract
Patterson KK, Parafianowicz I, Danells CJ, Closson V, Verrier MC, Staines WR, Black SE, McIlroy WE. Gait asymmetry in community-ambulating stroke survivors.
Objectives
To determine the prevalence and severity of asymmetry among independently ambulating stroke survivors and to establish the association between velocity and asymmetry.
Design
Descriptive analysis.
Setting
Research gait laboratory in a Canadian hospital.
Participants
Community-dwelling, independently ambulating participants (N=54) with chronic stroke.
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures
Overground gait velocity, symmetry ratios for temporal and spatial step parameters, and motor impairment of the foot and leg. Spatiotemporal parameters were collected with a pressure-sensitive mat. Motor impairment was measured clinically with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment.
Results
Thirty (55.5%) participants showed statistically significant temporal asymmetry and 18 (33.3%) exhibited statistically significant spatial asymmetry. Preferred velocity was negatively associated with temporal asymmetry (r=
−.583, df=52, P<.001) but not spatial asymmetry (r=−.146, df=52, P=.29). Temporal asymmetry was also associated with motor recovery of the leg (r=
−.644, df=35, P<.001) and foot (r=
−.628, df=35, P<.001).
Conclusions
The results of the current study illustrate that temporal asymmetry can be found in many independently ambulating stroke patients. The work highlights the need for a standard assessment of poststroke gait symmetry in light of the complex relationship with motor impairment and velocity.
Key Words: Cerebrovascular accident, Gait disorders, neurologic, Rehabilitation
Supported by the Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Marguerite Harland Smith Bursary, Lois Snelling Bursary, and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant no. MOP62957).
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.
PII: S0003-9993(07)01649-8
doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.142
© 2008 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 89, Issue 2 , Pages 304-310, February 2008
