Preliminary Outcomes of the SmartWheel Users’ Group Database: A Proposed Framework for Clinicians to Objectively Evaluate Manual Wheelchair Propulsion
Abstract
Cowan RE, Boninger ML, Sawatzky BJ, Mazoyer BD, Cooper RA. Preliminary outcomes of the SmartWheel Users’ Group database: a proposed framework for clinicians to objectively evaluate manual wheelchair propulsion.
Objectives
To describe a standard clinical protocol for the objective assessment of manual wheelchair propulsion; to establish preliminary values for temporal and kinetic parameters derived from the protocol; and to develop graphical references and a proposed application process for use by clinicians.
Design
Case series.
Setting
Six research institutions that collect kinetic wheelchair propulsion data and contribute that data to an international data pool.
Participants
Subjects with spinal cord injury (N=128).
Interventions
Subjects propelled a wheelchair from a stationary position to a self-selected velocity across a hard tile surface, a low pile carpet, and up an Americans with Disabilities Act−compliant ramp. Unilateral kinetic data were obtained from subjects using a force and moment sensing pushrim.
Main Outcome Measures
Differences in self-selected velocity, peak resultant force, push frequency, and stroke length across all surfaces, relationship between (1) weight-normalized peak resultant force and self-selected velocity and (2) push frequency and self-selected velocity.
Results
Graphical references were generated for potential clinical use based on the relation between body weight−normalized peak resultant force, push frequency, and velocity. Self-selected velocity decreased (ramp < carpet < tile), peak resultant forces increased (ramp > carpet > tile), and push frequency and stroke length remained unchanged when compared across the different surfaces. Weight-normalized peak resultant force was a significant predictor of velocity on tile and ramp. Push frequency was a significant predictor of velocity on tile, carpet, and ramp.
Conclusions
We present preliminary data generated from a clinically practical manual wheelchair propulsion evaluation protocol and we describe a proposed method for clinicians to objectively evaluate manual wheelchair propulsion.
aHuman Engineering Research Laboratories, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
bDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
cSchool of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
dVA Pittsburgh Health Care System Center of Excellence in Wheelchairs and Related Technology, Pittsburgh, PA
eDepartment of Rehabilitation Science and Technology, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
fDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
gBanner Good Samaritan Rehabilitation Institute, Phoenix, AZ.
Reprint requests to Michael L. Boninger, MD, Human Engineering Research Laboratories, VA Pittsburgh Health Care System, 5180 Highland Dr, 151R-1, Pittsburgh, PA 15206
Supported by the Paralyzed Veterans of America (grant no. 581), National Institutes of Health (grant no. 1 F31 HD053986-01), National Science Foundation (grant no. DGE0333420), National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (grant no. H133N000019), the Department of Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Research and Development (grant no. B3142C), and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (grant no. RGPIN 249489-02).
A commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has conferred or will confer a financial benefit upon the author or 1 or more of the authors. Boninger, Cooper, and Cowan have a nonfinancial affiliation with Three Rivers Holdings Inc in the form of subcontracted grants. Three Rivers Holdings licenses patents unrelated to this publication from the University of Pittsburgh. Cooper and Boninger receive royalties through the University of Pittsburgh from the sales of these licensed inventions.