Functional Significance of Ipsilesional Motor Deficits After Unilateral Stroke
Abstract
Chestnut C, Haaland KY. Functional significance of ipsilesional motor deficits after unilateral stroke.
Objective
To determine whether ipsilesional motor skills, which have been related to independent functioning, are present chronically after unilateral stroke and are more common in people with apraxia than in those without apraxia.
Design
Observational cohort comparing the performance of an able-bodied control group, stroke patients with left- or right-hemisphere damage matched for lesion volume, and left-hemisphere stroke patients with and without ideomotor limb apraxia.
Setting
Primary care Veterans Affairs and private medical center.
Participants
Volunteer right-handed sample; stroke patients with left- or right-hemisphere damage about 4 years poststroke; a control group of demographically matched, able-bodied adults.
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures
Total time to perform the (1) Williams doors test and the (2) timed manual performance test (TMPT), which includes parts of the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test.
Results
Ipsilesional motor deficits were present after left- or right-hemisphere stroke when using both measures, but deficits were consistently more common in patients with limb apraxia only for the TMPT.
Conclusions
These findings add to a growing literature that suggests that ipsilesional motor deficits may have a functional impact in unilateral stroke patients, especially in patients with ideomotor limb apraxia.
aUniversity of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM
bResearch Service & Behavioral Health Care Line, New Mexico VA Healthcare System, Albuquerque, NM.
Reprint requests to Kathleen Y. Haaland, PhD, Behavioral Healthcare Line, NMVAHCS, 1501 San Pedro SE, Albuquerque, NM 87108
Supported by a U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Merit Review Grant.
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.