Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 88, Issue 12 , Pages 1614-1621 , December 2007

Development and Validation of the Balance Outcome Measure for Elder Rehabilitation

  • Terry Haines, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Physiotherapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
    • Physiotherapy Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Terry Haines, PhD, Physiotherapy Department, GARU, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Ipswich Rd, Woolloongabba, QLD 4102, Australia
  • ,
  • Suzanne S. Kuys, BPhty

      Affiliations

    • Physiotherapy Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
    • School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
  • ,
  • Greg Morrison, BPhty

      Affiliations

    • Physiotherapy Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
  • ,
  • Jane Clarke, BPhty

      Affiliations

    • St Andrews War Memorial Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
  • ,
  • Paul Bew, BPhty

      Affiliations

    • The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
  • ,
  • Steven McPhail, BPhty

      Affiliations

    • Physiotherapy Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia

  • Image Result

    Distribution of scores for each item from inpatient admission and outpatient and domiciliary discharge data.

    Distribution of scores for each item from inpatient admission and outpatient and domiciliary discharge data.

  • Image Result

    Distribution of BOOMER scores from inpatient admission and outpatient and domiciliary discharge data.

    Distribution of BOOMER scores from inpatient admission and outpatient and domiciliary discharge data.

  • Image Result

    Point estimates and 95% CIs for minimum clinically significant differences for the BOOMER calculated from development and validation datasets. Data presented are point estimate and 95% CI of the mean

    Point estimates and 95% CIs for minimum clinically significant differences for the BOOMER calculated from development and validation datasets. Data presented are point estimate and 95% CI of the mean difference between groups. *Discharge BOOMER – admission BOOMER (within subjects), for inpatients discharged to the community. Admission BOOMER for subjects for whom improving standing balance was a fourth- or lower-ranked treatment goal – admission BOOMER for subjects who had improving standing balance as 1 of their top 3 treatment goals (between subjects). Admission BOOMER for outpatient or domiciliary patients – admission BOOMER for inpatients (between subjects). §Discharge BOOMER for patients whose living status at discharge was the community – discharge BOOMER for patients whose living status at discharge was not the community (eg, nursing home, hospital) (between subjects). Change in BOOMER (discharge – admission) for people whose improvement in FIM motor score was 10 points or more – change in BOOMER (discharge – admission) for people whose improvement in FIM motor score was less than 10 points (between subjects).

 Supported by the University of Queensland New Staff Research Fund.

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(07)01563-8

doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.09.012

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 88, Issue 12 , Pages 1614-1621 , December 2007