Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 88, Issue 12, Supplement 2 , Pages S7-S17 , December 2007

Assets and Liabilities of the Burn Model System Data Model: A Comparison With the National Burn Registry

  • Dennis C. Lezotte, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics, University of Colorado and Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Dennis C. Lezotte, PhD, Dept of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center School of Medicine, 4200 E 9th Ave, Campus Box B-119, Denver, CO 80262
  • ,
  • Rebecca A. Hills, MSPH

      Affiliations

    • Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics, University of Colorado and Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO
  • ,
  • Sonya L. Heltshe, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics, University of Colorado and Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO
  • ,
  • Radha K. Holavanahalli, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
  • ,
  • James A. Fauerbach, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
  • ,
  • Patricia Blakeney, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
  • ,
  • Matthew B. Klein, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Washington Burn Center and Division of Plastic Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA
  • ,
  • Loren H. Engrav, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Washington Burn Center and Division of Plastic Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA

References 

  1. Burn Model System announced priority. 62 Federal Register 9886 (Mar 4, 1997).
  2. Cook TD, Campbell DT. Quasi-experimentation: design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally; 1997;
  3. Harris AD, McGregor JC, Perencevich EN, et al. The use and interpretation of quasi-experimental studies in medical informatics. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13:16–23
  4. Klein M, Lezotte D, Fauerbach J, et al. The National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research burn model system database: a tool for the multicenter study of the outcome of burn injury. J Burn Care Res. 2007;28:84–96
  5. Miller SF, Bessey PQ, Schurr MJ, et al. National Burn Repository 2005: a ten-year review. J Burn Care Rehabil. 2006;27:411–436
  6. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT user’s guide, version 8. Cary: SAS Institute Inc; 1999;p 3884
  7. Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner WS, Grady D, Hearst N, Newman TB. Designing clinical research. 2nd ed.. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001;
  8. Jekel JF, Elmore JG, Katz DL. Epidemiology, biostatistics and preventive medicine. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1996;
  9. Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Modern epidemiology. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998;
  10. Kelsey JL, Thompson WD, Evans AS. Methods in observational epidemiology. New York: Oxford Univ Pr; 1986;
  11. Shadish M, Cook TD, Campbell DT. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 2002;
  12. Holavanahalli R, Lezotte D, Hayes M, et al. Profile of patients lost to follow-up in the Burn Injury Rehabilitation Model Systems’ longitudinal database. J Burn Care Res. 2006;27:703–712
  13. Fairclough DL. Design and analysis of quality of life studies in clinical trials. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC Pr; 2002;
  14. Hill AB. The environment and disease: association or causation?. Proc R Soc Med. 1965;58:295–300
  15. Hill AB. A short textbook of medical statistics. London: Hodder & Stoughton; 1977;
  16. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. 2nd ed.. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2000;
  17. Allison P. Logistic regression using the SAS system: theory and applications. Cary: SAS Institute Inc; 1999;
  18. Cnaan A, Laird NM, Slasor P. Tutorial in biostatistics: using the generalized linear mixed model to analyze unbalanced repeated measures and longitudinal data statistics in medicine. Stat Med. 1987;16:2349–2380
  19. Cole JWL, Grizzle JE. Applications of multivariate analysis of variance to repeated measurements experiments. Biometrics. 1966;22:810–828
  20. Laird NM, Ware JH. Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics. 1982;38:963–974
  21. Littell RC, Stroup WW, Freund RJ. SAS system for mixed models, version 4. Cary: SAS Institute Inc; 2002;
  22. Susser M. Causal thinking in the health sciences. New York: Oxford Univ Pr; 1973;
  23. Mill JS. A system of Logic (1856). In:  Last JM editors. A dictionary of epidemiology. 2nd ed.. New York: Oxford Univ Pr; 1988;Summarized in:
  24. Evans AS. Causation and disease: the Henle-Koch postulates revisited. Yale J Biol Med. 1976;149:175–195

 Supported by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Service, U.S. Department of Education (grant no. H133A020402).

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(07)01562-6

doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.09.011

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 88, Issue 12, Supplement 2 , Pages S7-S17 , December 2007