Journal Home
Search for

Volume 88, Issue 11, Pages 1410-1415 (November 2007)


View previous. 9 of 35 View next.

Reliability and Validity of the Dynamic Gait Index in Persons With Chronic Stroke

Johanna Jonsdottir, ScDCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Davide Cattaneo, PT

Abstract 

Jonsdottir J, Cattaneo D. Reliability and validity of the Dynamic Gait Index in persons with chronic stroke.

Objective

To establish the test-retest and interrater reliability as well as the concurrent construct validity of the Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) as a measure for dynamic balance in people with chronic stroke.

Design

Cohort study.

Setting

Day hospital and ambulatory care at a rehabilitation center.

Participants

A consecutive sample of 25 participants, at least 3 months poststroke and able to walk at least 10m with or without a walking aid, participated in the study. Two independent raters rated performances on the DGI.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

The DGI was administered in 2 testing sessions 3 days apart. In the second session, the participants were rated by 2 raters. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), model 2,1, and the Bland and Altman method were used to analyze total scores and item scores. Concurrent construct validity was tested by correlating results to the Berg Balance Scale, the timed walking test, the Timed Up & Go test, and the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale.

Results

ICCs for test-retest and interrater reliability of total scores were good (.96, .96, respectively) whereas reliability for single item scores was moderate to good (range, .55−.93). The hypotheses for concurrent construct validity were confirmed with all measures (range, .68−.83).

Conclusions

The DGI showed high reliability and showed evidence of concurrent validity with other balance and mobility scales. It is a useful clinical tool for evaluating dynamic balance in ambulatory people with chronic stroke.

LaRiCE: Clinical Laboratory on Posture and Gait, Don Gnocchi Foundation I.R.C.C.S., Milan, Italy.

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Johanna Jonsdottir, ScD, Servizio riabilitazione neurologica adulti (Int. 282), Don Gnocchi Foundation I.R.C.C.S., Via Capecelatro 66, 20148 Milan, Italy

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(07)01447-5

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.109


View previous. 9 of 35 View next.