Journal Home
Search for

Volume 88, Issue 11, Pages 1400-1409 (November 2007)


View previous. 8 of 35 View next.

Employment After Traumatic Brain Injury: Differences Between Men and Women

John D. Corrigan, PhDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Lee A. Lineberry, MSb, Eugene Komaroff, PhDc, Jean A. Langlois, ScD, MPHd, Anbesaw W. Selassie, DrPHb, Kenneth D. Wood, PhDc

Abstract 

Corrigan JD, Lineberry LA, Komaroff E, Langlois JA, Selassie AW, Wood KD. Employment after traumatic brain injury: differences between men and women.

Objective

To determine whether there are sex differences in employment 1 year after traumatic brain injury.

Design

Prospective cohort.

Setting

Acute care hospitals in South Carolina and Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems (TBIMS) rehabilitation centers.

Participants

Subjects in the TBIMS national dataset and the South Carolina Traumatic Brain Injury Follow-up Registry who were expected to be working before injury and followed at 1 year postinjury.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measure

Change in employment from preinjury to 1 year postinjury.

Results

When other measured influences on change in hours worked were held constant, there were significant interactions for sex by age and sex by marital status. Compared with men, women were more likely to decrease hours or stop working, except in the oldest age group (55−64y) in which men were more likely to stop working. For women, there was a pattern showing better employment outcomes as age increased. Decreased employment for women was most evident for married women, who were much more likely to reduce hours or stop working. There was also a tendency for divorced women to be more likely to stop working when compared with divorced men.

Conclusions

These findings run counter to the current literature. Although definitive explanations must await future studies, causal factors arising from differential societal behavior toward women as well as discriminatory attitudes about women and employment deserve further study.

a Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH

b Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, & Epidemiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC

c Kessler Medical Rehabilitation Research and Education Center, West Orange, NJ

d National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to John D. Corrigan, PhD, Dept of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ohio State University, 480 Medical Center Dr, Columbus, OH 43210

 Supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (grant no. H133A011403), the Ohio Regional Traumatic Brain Injury Model System (grant no. H133A020503), the South Carolina Traumatic Brain Injury Follow-up Registry (award no. U17/CCU421926), and the Henry H. Kessler Foundation.

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(07)01344-5

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.006


View previous. 8 of 35 View next.