Volume 88, Issue 11 , Pages 1465-1467, November 2007
Allergic Reactions to Gadodiamide Following Interventional Spinal Procedures: A Report of 4 Cases
Abstract
O’Donnell CJ, Cano WG. Allergic reactions to gadodiamide following interventional spinal procedures: a report of 4 cases.
Gadodiamide is currently considered a safe alternative for use in interventional spinal procedures in persons with a documented allergic response to iodine-based contrast dyes and with adequate renal function. The most common reactions to gadodiamide are nausea, emesis, and headache. These reactions usually are self-limited and are reported to occur in less than 1% of patients. We report the cases of 4 patients who developed an allergic reaction to gadodiamide, 3 of whom presented within the same week, after minimally invasive interventional spinal procedures at an outpatient private practice facility. Furthermore, 3 of the 4 patients had previously been exposed to gadodiamide during prior interventional spinal procedures without reaction, and the fourth patient had a reaction on the first exposure. The clinical presentation was manifested as a rash in 3 of the 4 patients, whereas the fourth patient experienced fevers and rigors along with rash. Because the injections of gadodiamide were not administered in succession, different vials of gadodiamide were used in each patient, and the injections were given by different clinicians at different spinal levels, we hypothesize that these patients experienced an allergic reaction, rather than contamination of the gadodiamide solution. These cases may call into question the safety of gadodiamide as an alternative contrast agent.
Key Words: Allergy, Case report, Gadolinium, Injections, epidural, Rehabilitation, Spine
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.
PII: S0003-9993(07)01339-1
doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.002
© 2007 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 88, Issue 11 , Pages 1465-1467, November 2007
