Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 88, Issue 11 , Pages 1441-1445, November 2007

Differences in Isometric Neck Muscle Strength Between Healthy Controls and Women With Chronic Neck Pain: The Use of a Reliable Measurement

  • Barbara Cagnie, PT, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Barbara Cagnie, PT, PhD, Dept of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 6K3, B-9000 Ghent
  • ,
  • Ann Cools, PT, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
  • ,
  • Veerle De Loose, PT

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Therapy, Centre for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Queen Astrid Military Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
  • ,
  • Dirk Cambier, PT, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
  • ,
  • Lieven Danneels, PT, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

Abstract 

Cagnie B, Cools A, De Loose V, Cambier D, Danneels L. Differences in isometric neck muscle strength between healthy controls and women with chronic neck pain: the use of a reliable measurement.

Objectives

To determine the intra- and interrater reliability of the Biodex isokinetic dynamometer to measure the maximal isometric strength of the cervical flexors and extensors, to develop an age- and sex-based normative database in a healthy population, and to evaluate the differences in neck strength between women with chronic neck pain and healthy controls.

Design

Cross-sectional.

Setting

Physical and rehabilitation medicine department.

Participants

Ninety-six healthy volunteers (4 age groups: 20–29, 30–39, 40–49, 50–59y; each consisting of 12 men and 12 women) and 30 women with chronic neck pain.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Peak isometric strength of the cervical muscles was tested for flexion and extension by using the Biodex isokinetic dynamometer. The intra- and interrater reliability of the protocol was evaluated in 12 volunteers.

Results

The reliability for strength was high for both flexion and extension (intraclass correlation coefficient, .92–.96). The mean peak torque for flexion and extension was significantly higher in men (24Nm, 36.4Nm, respectively) compared with women (16.6Nm, 26.5Nm, respectively) (P<.001). Peak torque production for extension was significantly lower in the patient group (22.3Nm) compared with the healthy female control group (26.5Nm) (P=.003). No significant differences in flexion strength between patient and female control group were found.

Conclusions

Results show a high degree of intra- and interrater reliability in measuring isometric neck muscle strength when using the Biodex isokinetic dynamometer. The use of normative data for neck strength when evaluating patients with neck disorders needs to take sex into account. The current study has shown that women with chronic neck pain have lower neck muscle strength in extension than the healthy female group.

Key Words: Neck pain, Rehabilitation, Reliability and validity

 

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(07)01288-9

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.06.776

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 88, Issue 11 , Pages 1441-1445, November 2007