Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 88, Issue 10 , Pages 1268-1275 , October 2007

Mobility Assistive Device Utilization in a Prospective Study of Patients With First-Ever Stroke

  • Jeffrey Jutai, PhD, CPsych

      Affiliations

    • Lawson Health Research Institute, St. Joseph’s Health Care London, Parkwood Hospital Site, London, ON, Canada
    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Jeffrey W. Jutai, PhD, CPsych, Dept of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Parkwood Hospital, Room B-3002a, 801 Commissioners Rd E, London, ON N6C 5J1, Canada
  • ,
  • Sherry Coulson, MA

      Affiliations

    • Lawson Health Research Institute, St. Joseph’s Health Care London, Parkwood Hospital Site, London, ON, Canada
    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
  • ,
  • Robert Teasell, MD

      Affiliations

    • Lawson Health Research Institute, St. Joseph’s Health Care London, Parkwood Hospital Site, London, ON, Canada
    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
  • ,
  • Mark Bayley, MD

      Affiliations

    • Toronto Rehabilitation Institute & Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • ,
  • Jayne Garland, PhD, PT

      Affiliations

    • School of Physical Therapy, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
  • ,
  • Nancy Mayo, PhD, PT

      Affiliations

    • School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • ,
  • Sharon Wood-Dauphinee, PhD, PT

      Affiliations

    • School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

References 

  1. Gove PB. Merriam-Webster Editorial Staff, editors (Webster’s third new international dictionary of the English language unabridged). Springfield: Merriam-Webster; 1986;
  2. Odding E, Valkenburg HA, Stam HJ, Hofman A. Determinants of locomotor disability in people aged 55 years and over: The Rotterdam study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2001;17:1033–1041
  3. Isaacs B. Clinical and laboratory studies of falls in old people. Clin Geriatr Med. 1985;1:513–524
  4. Agree E. The influence of personal care and assistive devices on the measurement of disability. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48:427–443
  5. Bateni H, Maki BE. Assistive devices for balance and mobility: benefits, demands and adverse consequences. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:134–145
  6. Gitlin LN, Mann W, Tomita M, Marcus SM. Factors associated with home environmental problems among community living older people. Disabil Rehabil. 2001;23:777–787
  7. Mann WC, Ottenbacher KJ, Fraas L, Tomita M, Granger CV. Effectiveness of assistive technology and environmental interventions in maintaining independence and reducing home care costs for frail elderly: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Fam Med. 1999;8:210–217
  8. Verbrugge L, Rennert C, Madans J. The greater efficacy of personal and equipment assistance in reducing disability. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:384–392
  9. Allen SM, Foster A, Berg K. Receiving help at home: The interplay of human and technological assistance. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2001;56:S374–S382
  10. Hoenig H, Taylor D, Sloan F. Assistive technology is associated with reduced use of personal assistance among disabled older persons. In: Paper presented to: Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Geriatrics Society. 2001;May; Chicago (IL).
  11. Mann WC, Hurren D, Tomita M, Charvat B. Assistive devices for home-based older stroke survivors. Top Geriatr Rehabil. 1995;10:75–76
  12. Laufer Y. The use of walking aids in the rehabilitation of stroke patients. Rev Clin Gerontol. 2004;14.2:137–144
  13. Teasell R, Foley N, Salter K, et al. Evidence-based review of stroke rehabilitation. 2005;Available at: http://www.ebrsr.com. Accessed July 12, 2007.
  14. Chiou IL, Burnett CN. Values of activities of daily living: a survey of stroke patients and their home therapists. Phys Ther. 1985;65:901–907
  15. McMurdo T, Johnstone R. A randomized controlled trial of a home exercise programme for elderly people with poor mobility. Age Ageing. 1995;24:425–428
  16. Myers AH, Young Y, Langlois JA. Prevention of falls in the elderly. Bone. 1996;18(1 Suppl):87S–101S
  17. Overstall PW, Exton-Smith AN, Imms FJ, Johnson AL. Falls in the elderly related to postural imbalance. Br Med J. 1977;1:261–264
  18. Fernie GR, Gryfe GR, Holliday PJ, Llewellyn A. The relationship of postural sway in standing to the incidence of falls in geriatric subjects. Age Ageing. 1982;11:11–16
  19. Maeda A, Nakamura K, Higuchi S, Yuasa T, Motohashi Y. Postural sway during cane use by patients with stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80:903–908
  20. Jutai JW, Fuhrer M, Demers L, Scherer M, DeRuyter F. Conceptualization of assistive technology device intervention-outcome relationships. In: Paper presented to: 28th Annual Conference of the Rehabilitation Engineering Society of North America. 2005;June; Atlanta (GA).
  21. Côté R, Hachinski VC, Shurvell BL, Norris JW, Wolfson C. The Canadian Neurological Scale: a preliminary study in acute stroke. Stroke. 1986;17:731–737
  22. Côté R, Battista RN, Wolfson C, Boucher J, Adam J, Hachinski V. The Canadian Neurological Scale: validation and reliability assessment. Neurology. 1989;39:638–643
  23. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: The Barthel index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–65
  24. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state.” A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189–198
  25. Duncan P, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ. The Stroke Impact Scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999;30:2131–2140
  26. Salter K, Jutai J, Teasell R, Foley N, Bitensky J, Bayley M. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF participation. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27:507–528
  27. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) (I. Conceptual framework and item selection). Med Care. 1992;30:473–483
  28. Hamilton BB, Granger CV, Sherwin FS, Zielezny M, Tashman JS. A uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation. In:  Fuhrer MJ editors. Rehabilitation outcomes: analysis and measurement. Baltimore: PH Brookes; 1987;p. 137–147
  29. Oczkowski WJ, Barreca S. The Functional Independence Measure: its use to identify rehabilitation needs in stroke survivors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:1291–1294
  30. Haley SM, Andres PL, Coster WJ, Kosinski M, Ni PS, Jette AM. Short-form Activity Measures for Post-Acute Care. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:649–660
  31. Haley SM, Coster WJ, Andres P, et al. Activity outcome measurement for post-acute care. Med Care. 2004;42(Suppl l):I49–I61
  32. Hoenig H, Pieper C, Zolkewitz M, Schenkman M, Branch LG. Wheelchair users are not necessarily wheelchair bound. J Am Geriatric Soc. 2002;50:645–654
  33. Neugarten BL. Age groups in American society and the rise of the young-old. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 1974;187–198
  34. Neugarten BL. The future of the young-old. Gerontologist. 1975;15:4–9
  35. Minor MA, Minor SD. Patient care skills. Norwalk: Appleton & Lange; 1995;
  36. Gitlin LN. From hospital to home: individual variations in experience with assistive devices among older adults. In:  Gray DB,  Quatrano LA,  Lieberman ML editor. Designing and using assistive technology: the human perspective. Baltimore: PH Brookes; 1998;p. 117–136

 Supported by the Canadian Stroke Network (grant no. CSN-2000-011).

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(07)01280-4

doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.06.773

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 88, Issue 10 , Pages 1268-1275 , October 2007