Journal Home
Search for

Volume 88, Issue 9, Pages 1095-1100 (September 2007)


View previous. 5 of 387 View next.

Effect of a Home Leisure Education Program After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Johanne Desrosiers, PhDabCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Luc Noreau, PhDc, Annie Rochette, PhDd, Hélène Carbonneau, MAa, Lyne Fontaine, BAa, Chantal Viscogliosi, MAa, Gina Bravo, PhDab

Abstract 

Desrosiers J, Noreau L, Rochette A, Carbonneau H, Fontaine L, Viscogliosi C, Bravo G. Effect of a home leisure education program after stroke: a randomized controlled trial.

Objective

To evaluate the effect of a leisure education program on participation in and satisfaction with leisure activities (leisure-related outcomes), and well-being, depressive symptoms, and quality of life (primary outcomes) after stroke.

Design

Randomized controlled trial.

Setting

Home and community.

Participants

Sixty-two people with stroke.

Intervention

Experimental participants (n=33) received the leisure education program at home once a week for 8 to 12 weeks. Control participants (n=29) were visited at home at a similar frequency. Participants were evaluated before and after the program by a blinded assessor.

Main Outcome Measures

Change from preintervention to postintervention in: minutes of leisure activity per day, number of leisure activities, the Leisure Satisfaction Scale, the Individualized Leisure Profile, the General Well-Being Schedule (GWBS), the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale, and the Stroke-Adapted Sickness Impact Profile (SA-SIP30).

Results

There was a statistically significant difference in change scores between the groups for satisfaction with leisure with a mean difference of 11.9 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2−19.5) and participation in active leisure with a mean difference of 14.0 minutes (95% CI, 3.2−24.9). There was also a statistically significant difference between groups for improvement in depressive symptoms with a mean difference of −7.2 (95% CI, −12.5 to −1.9). Differences between groups were not statistically significant on the SA-SIP30 (0.2; 95% CI, −1.3 to 1.8) and GWBS (2.2; 95% CI, −5.6 to 10.0).

Conclusions

The results indicate the effectiveness of the leisure education program for improving participation in leisure activities, improving satisfaction with leisure and reducing depression in people with stroke.

a Research Centre on Aging, University Institute of Geriatrics of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada

b Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada

c Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Rehabilitation Department and Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada

d School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to Johanne Desrosiers, PhD, Research Centre on Aging, 1036 Belvédère sud, Sherbrooke, QC J1H 4C4, Canada

 Supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant no. MOP-49526).

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.

 Reprints are not available from the author.

PII: S0003-9993(07)00437-6

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.06.017


View previous. 5 of 387 View next.