Volume 88, Issue 9 , Pages 1159-1163, September 2007
Mechanics of Ambulation With Standard and Spring-Loaded Crutches
Abstract
Segura A, Piazza SJ. Mechanics of ambulation with standard and spring-loaded crutches.
Objective
To compare kinetic measures and spatiotemporal variables assessed during walking with standard axillary crutches and spring-loaded crutches.
Design
A repeated-measures design in which healthy subjects walked with both standard and spring-loaded crutches.
Setting
Biomechanics research laboratory.
Participants
Ten healthy young adult volunteers participated. Only female volunteers between 154.9 and 175.3cm in stature were selected to fit the size of the crutches used.
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures
The main outcome measures were kinetic variables such as ground reaction force, rate of force rise, and impulse and spatiotemporal variables such as stride length, stride time, and percentage of stride spent in stance.
Results
The rate of ground reaction force rise and impulse of the ground reaction force (both P<.001) were reduced by 33% and 13% to 26%, respectively, but the peak ground reaction force was slightly greater (P=.001) with spring-loaded crutches. The stride time was increased with spring-loaded crutches (P=.005), but the stride length did not differ significantly (P=.465).
Conclusions
The use of spring-loaded crutches altered the mechanics of crutch gait in ways that are likely to reduce overuse injury in crutch users. Further study of spring-loaded crutches is warranted, especially with respect to their energetic efficiency.
Key Words: Biomechanics, Crutches, Gait, Rehabilitation
Supported by the National Science Foundation (grant no. BES-0134217).
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.
PII: S0003-9993(07)00422-4
doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.05.026
© 2007 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 88, Issue 9 , Pages 1159-1163, September 2007
